Relationships Between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and Self-Reported Research Practices

Abstract

Background The Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) is a validated tool to facilitate promotion of research integrity and research best practices. This work uses the SORC to assess shared and individual perceptions of the research climate in universities and academic departments and relate these perceptions to desirable and undesirable research practices. Methods An anonymous web- and mail-based survey was administered to randomly selected biomedical and social science faculty and postdoctoral fellows in the United States. Respondents reported their perceptions of the research climates at their universities and primary departments, and the frequency with which they engaged in desirable and undesirable research practices. Results More positive individual perceptions of the research climate in one’s university or department were associated with higher likelihoods of desirable, and lower likelihoods of undesirable, research practices. Shared perceptions of the research climate tended to be similarly predictive of both desirable and undesirable research practices as individuals’ deviations from these shared perceptions. Conclusions Study results supported the central prediction that more positive SORC-measured perceptions of the research climate were associated with more positive reports of research practices. There were differences with respect to whether shared or individual climate perceptions were related to desirable or undesirable practices but the general pattern of results provide empirical evidence that the SORC is predictive of self-reported research behavior.

Making Professional Decisions in Research: Measurement and Key Predictors

“…Moral disengagement is a function of cognitive distortions that support self-interested thinking (DuBois, Chibnall, and Gibbs 2015), and it is unclear whether and how environmental or educational factors reinforce or reduce disengagement. Thus, future work might examine whether environmental variables such as organizational climate exert an influence on disengagement (Crain, Martinson, and Thrush 2013; Martinson et al 2010). RCR educational efforts might also consider whether and how existing and new approaches to research integrity training might foster interest in engaging ethical issues in research (Antes et al 2010, Devereaux 2014, Kalichman 2014b).…”

Neutralising fair credit: factors that influence unethical authorship practices

“…Situational factors include competition among scientists for funding, conflicting roles in the workplace, and stress in personal or family life 16 18–20. Structural factors include features of institutional climate, such as the degree to which ‘publish or perish’ is reflected in an institution's productivity review process, and the degree to which institutions project a commitment to research integrity 21. These known factors reflect defects in personality , defects in transient circumstances , and defects in institutional climate ; but there has been little research on defects in the decision-making process , namely avoidance of perceived threats of harm and processes of rationalisation.…”

Research Integrity: Perspectives from China and the United States

“…ORI's 2001 funding announcement noted that "no systematic effort has been made to evaluate the different approaches to transmitting high standards for integrity in research, making it difficult to know which ones, if any, are effective," (U.S. Office of Research Integrity 2001) and encouraged the submission of proposals to address that gap. A recent effort is the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (Crain et al 2013), which generates data on "seven dimensions of local research climate to inform, motivate, and help to evaluate efforts to improve those climates and to promote responsible research." Much more remains to be done.…”