2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2005.01164.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between water‐use traits and photosynthesis in Brassica oleracea resolved by quantitative genetic analysis

Abstract: The genetic control of water-use and photosynthetic traits in Brassica oleracea is resolved by genetic analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL). Variations in leaf conductance, photosynthetic assimilation rate, leaf thickness and leaf nitrogen content were assessed in a segregating population of F 1 -derived doubled haploid (DH) B. oleracea lines. In addition, stable carbon isotope ratios in leaf organic material were used as a surrogate measure of plant water-use efficiency. Analysis of an existing linkage m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In rice, one to three QTLs for Δ 13 C were identified by Laza et al (2006) and Takai et al (2006), three to five by Price et al (2002), and four by Xu et al (2009). Up to seven QTLs were identified in Stylosanthes scabra (Thumma et al 2001), two to five in barley (Diab et al 2004;Ellis et al 2002;Teulat et al 2002), and four to five in Brassica oleracea (Hall et al 2005). In these studies, individual QTLs explained ≤30% of the phenotypic variation for Δ 13 C, consistent with results from the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In rice, one to three QTLs for Δ 13 C were identified by Laza et al (2006) and Takai et al (2006), three to five by Price et al (2002), and four by Xu et al (2009). Up to seven QTLs were identified in Stylosanthes scabra (Thumma et al 2001), two to five in barley (Diab et al 2004;Ellis et al 2002;Teulat et al 2002), and four to five in Brassica oleracea (Hall et al 2005). In these studies, individual QTLs explained ≤30% of the phenotypic variation for Δ 13 C, consistent with results from the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…These hypotheses will require future functional analyses, which are well developed in tomato (Gupta et al 2009). Regardless, despite intense interest in stomata because of their role in adaptation to climate change, ours is among the first studies on the genetics of natural variation in stomata density and distribution (Hall et al 2005; Rae et al 2006; Gailing et al 2008), and the first study of stomatal ratio genetics.…”
Section: Structure-function Relationship Reveals the Mechanistic Signmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are reports of work with Triticum aesvum L. (Zhang, 1998;Richards et al, 2002;Sheshshayee et al, 2003;Tuberosa, 2003Tuberosa, , 2005, Triticum vulgare L. (Handley et al, 1994;Teulat et al, 2002;Ellis et al, 2002;Molnar et al, 2007), Oryza sativa L. (Fischer et al, 2003), Zea mays L. (Banziger et al, 2000), Gossypium spp. (Warwick et al, 2005;Saranga et al, 2001), Glycine max L. (Mian et al, 1996(Mian et al, , 1998, Lycopersicum esculentum Mill (Martin et al, 1989;Lin et al, 2002), and Brassica oleracea (Hall et al, 2005). Compared with other methods for saving water, breeding new crop varieties with a high yield and WUE as well as drought-resistance has the following merits: less investment by the grower, greater uptake through low costs of technology transfer, sustainable efficiency; and more potential exploitation.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, eight out of ten barley QTLs that co-segregated for Δ co-located with QTLs for physiological traits related to plant water status and/or osmotic adjustment (Teulat et al, 2002). In B. oleracea, stable carbon isotope discrimination had QTL located with WUE l , photosynthetic capacity with leaf thickness, and nitrogen content and stomatal density with leaf thickness (Hall et al, 2005). In peanuts, WUE l is correlated with the SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR), specific leaf area (SLA), and Δ.…”
Section: Zhang Zhengbin Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%