1984
DOI: 10.1080/02705060.1984.9664611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships between Zooplankton Abundance and Chlorophyll a Concentrations in Florida Lakes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several authors studied the seasonality of various zooplankton groups in individual Florida lakes [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Rotifera and Copepoda nauplii (i.e., two of three groups that comprise microzooplankton) displayed seasonal patterns that seem independent of trophic state [18].…”
Section: Zooplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors studied the seasonality of various zooplankton groups in individual Florida lakes [11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Rotifera and Copepoda nauplii (i.e., two of three groups that comprise microzooplankton) displayed seasonal patterns that seem independent of trophic state [18].…”
Section: Zooplanktonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chlorophyll a concentrations did not have significant Spearman Rank Correlations with zooplankton abundance. Although this relationship has been demonstrated for Florida lakes (Bays & Crisman, 1983;Canfield & Watkins, 1984), significant correlation between these parameters was not expected due to the limited range of chlorophyll values exhibited in the four lakes and the high level of variance associated with this relationship.…”
Section: Diversity Indices Year 1 Shannon Year 2 Shannon Year 3 Shannmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of these strong correlations, we restricted later analyses to only chlorophyll, which is the indicator of actual biological biomass. Conventional wisdom suggests that the base fertility of a lake (trophic status) is a primary driver for the abundance of aquatic organisms, including but not limited to zooplankton abundance (Canfield and Watkins 1984), fish populations (Bachmann et al 1996), bird abundance (Hoyer and Canfield 1994), and even populations of top predators like the alligator (Evert 1999). All these results support the predictions of Fretwell (1987), who suggested that as nutrient levels increase among systems, the abundance of organisms, including top predators, would also increase.…”
Section: Managing Fish For the Benefit Of Peoplementioning
confidence: 99%