2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.2010.00729.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships of Body Weight, Body Size, Subject Velocity, and Vertical Ground Reaction Forces in Trotting Dogs

Abstract: BW, body size, and relative dog velocity must be accounted for when wanting to obtain GRF variables that are comparable between different dogs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
114
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
6
114
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences between individual dogs accounted for the largest variance effect in this heterogeneous population, confirming our primary hypothesis. This was anticipated (Bertram et al, 2000; Voss et al, 2010; 2011). Our data were normalized using percent body weight (100*N/N) before analysis, as is typically performed in clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Differences between individual dogs accounted for the largest variance effect in this heterogeneous population, confirming our primary hypothesis. This was anticipated (Bertram et al, 2000; Voss et al, 2010; 2011). Our data were normalized using percent body weight (100*N/N) before analysis, as is typically performed in clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The standard process of GRF normalization with body weight alone appears insufficient to control for all size-dependent variability (Voss et al, 2010). When additional dog-specific morphometric measurements are used for data normalization, significant differences between breeds are still recognized (Voss et al, 2011; Krotscheck et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, GRF and stance times of dogs still varied by approximately 10%, even after full data normalization as showed Voss et al (2010) in a study with 129 dogs of different breeds trotting at a range of velocity of 2.0 ± 0.15 m/s. Differences in fully normalized gait parameters were found between Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers indicating that these two breeds have certain distinctive and specific gait patterns (Bertram et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As previously reported, treadmill allows to insert additional devices for gait analysis; between them, force plate analysis is an objective, sensitive and accurate method to evaluate limb loading in dogs (Vilar et al 2013); however, force plate gait analysis provides large variation of normal ground reaction forces (GRFs) that prevent meaningful direct comparison of data between different dogs or dog groups (Voss et al 2010). To minimize this, some authors try to homogenize the animal groups using dogs of the same breed (Vilar et al 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, increases in locomotor speed are expected to be coupled with increases in muscle excitation in all of the extrinsic muscles, because with increasing speed the mechanical cost of transport increases (Cavagna et al, 1977;Willems et al, 1995) and the force impulse of a given footfall increases [e.g. in dogs (Budsberg et al, 1987;Rumph et al, 1994;Bertram et al, 2000;Bockstahler et al, 2007;Walter and Carrier, 2007;Mölsa et al, 2010;Voss et al, 2010)]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%