Relationships of macrophyte species richness and environment in different water body types in the Central European region

Abstract

Individual types of waterbodies are characterised by their specific environmental conditions controlling growth of aquatic macrophytes. We focused on effects of environmental factors on macrophyte species richness in canals, ponds, rivers and streams within Central European region. We employed generalised linear models (GLM) to assess separately overall macrophyte species data and data on wetland species (true aquatic plants and helophytes). No significant difference was revealed by comparing species richness among water body types, though canals were the richest water bodies and streams supported the lowest diversity of macrophytes. The models for all the waterbodies, except streams, contained at least two variables and the explained variability ranged from 37% to 77%. The most recurring variables were the coverage of fine substrate, turbidity, shading by bank and shore trees and shrubs, and altitude. Nevertheless, no obvious pattern of factors was observed for particular water body types. Our study confirmed that aquatic macrophyte species richness is shaped by a complexity of factors and necessity of targeting survey and further generalisation of results not only on one specific water body.

Breaking the misconception of a dry and lifeless semiarid region: the diversity and distribution of aquatic flora in wetlands of the Brazilian Northeast

“…Aquatic plant richness is related to other environmental factors in lentic systems (Alahuhta et al 2014;Ferreira et al 2015), which makes it difficult to generalize about the diversity of these ecosystems (Bubíková & Hrivnák 2018). However, it is possible to observe that there is a set of exclusive species that are evolutionarily associated with these ecosystems.…”

“…In contrast, the movement of the water column in lotic ecosystems is considered a significant driver of macrophytes diversity (Lacoul & Freedman 2006;Bornette & Puijalon 2011) because water speed selects species with morphological adaptations like streamlined shapes, straplike leaves or flat shoots (Chambers et al 1991).Other adaptations include those that allow plants to attach firmly to the rocky substrate in rapid streams and waterfalls by specialized structures, such as disk-like holdfasts (haptera) found in Podostemaceae (Rutishauser et al 2005), so that only Apinagia gardneriana and Mourera aspera have records limited to these ecosystems (Bubíková & Hrivnák 2018). In the present study, lotic ecosystems showed low values of richness and a low number of exclusive species (12 or 5.47 %).…”

Assessment of freshwater plant diversity and local difference in freshwater plant use knowledge in Punakha district, Bhutan

“…With the evenness value close to 0.5 for all the habitats, the analysis showed that the freshwater plant species were moderately uniformly distributed in all the habitats. Bubíková and Hrivnák (2018b) stated that all the water bodies have similar freshwater plant species richness. The authors argued that it is the environmental factors that influences the freshwater plants' diversity and richness and not the water body type.…”

Delineating the influence of water conditions and landscape on plant communities in eutrophic ditch networks

“…Wooded environments are known to negatively impact aquatic plant richness or Fig. 4 Main two-way relationships between plant community descriptors and environmental variables of the ditches (also see Table 3) considering data from all 11 sites 9 4 years plant cover in rivers and shallow lakes (Riis et al 2001;Julian et al 2011;Shaw et al 2015), owing to a direct shading effect (Bornette and Puijalon 2011;Bubíková and Hrivnák 2018b). Confounding effects may exist between the effects of wooded contexts and other environmental variables on ditch plant communities.…”