2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relationships of Reproductive Coercion and Intimate Partner Violence to Unintended Pregnancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
45
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Though our study was cross-sectional, which limits our ability to draw conclusions regarding causality, the effect of IPV on unintended pregnancy was both direct and indirect. The direct effect could be through coerced pregnancy (coercion by husband to become pregnant) or coerced unprotected sex (coercion by partner to have sex against her will) [41,42]. This study further revealed that IPV might influence unintended pregnancy indirectly by reducing women's autonomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though our study was cross-sectional, which limits our ability to draw conclusions regarding causality, the effect of IPV on unintended pregnancy was both direct and indirect. The direct effect could be through coerced pregnancy (coercion by husband to become pregnant) or coerced unprotected sex (coercion by partner to have sex against her will) [41,42]. This study further revealed that IPV might influence unintended pregnancy indirectly by reducing women's autonomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…However, there is evidence that partner controlling behaviour is a reflection of power dynamics in an intimate relationship and indicates imminent risk of other forms of abuse [27,39]. Studies have also revealed that partners' control influences women's decision-making power [27], health service access and utilization [27,40], and fertility control [15,41,42]. Therefore, we have adopted the World Health Organization (WHO) definition of IPV (1 p89) and included partner control as a form of IPV in our analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPV may be linked to unintended pregnancy via another form of gender-based violence, reproductive coercion (RC), which has been shown in the United States to be independently associated with risk for unintended pregnancy, above and beyond the risk associated with IPV [6]. Research in many global settings have found that women's experiences of IPV and RC are positively associated with one another [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women and girls of reproductive age who seek contraceptives in health settings report higher rates of IPV than their same age peers [2][3][4], and those experiencing this form of genderbased violence (GBV) are significantly more likely to report unintended pregnancies and other poor sexual and reproductive health (SRH) outcomes [5][6][7][8]. Women and girls experiencing such abuse also report higher incidence of male partner opposition to their use of contraceptives [2,[9][10][11]. In 2018, the Lancet Commission on Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights found that GBV was a significant contributor to global unmet need for contraception and unintended pregnancy, with the greatest proportion and relative impacts of GBV experienced by women and girls in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%