1996
DOI: 10.1016/0301-6226(95)00091-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative carcass value of Simmental, Holstein and their crosses based on veal calves, fattening bulls and culled cows in Switzerland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few studies have quantified the factors associated with cull cow market value. Differences in yield and value of individual retail cuts of HF and Si cow carcasses were studied by Kaufmann et al (1996). The carcasses of young Si females in the study of Kaufmann et al (1996) were 21.9% more valuable than those of HF cows but this difference in value was reduced to 8.5% in older cows; in the present study, the difference in carcass values was 33.1 and 24.2% in young and older cows, respectively.…”
Section: Carcass Price and Value Of Culled Cowsmentioning
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Few studies have quantified the factors associated with cull cow market value. Differences in yield and value of individual retail cuts of HF and Si cow carcasses were studied by Kaufmann et al (1996). The carcasses of young Si females in the study of Kaufmann et al (1996) were 21.9% more valuable than those of HF cows but this difference in value was reduced to 8.5% in older cows; in the present study, the difference in carcass values was 33.1 and 24.2% in young and older cows, respectively.…”
Section: Carcass Price and Value Of Culled Cowsmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Differences in yield and value of individual retail cuts of HF and Si cow carcasses were studied by Kaufmann et al (1996). The carcasses of young Si females in the study of Kaufmann et al (1996) were 21.9% more valuable than those of HF cows but this difference in value was reduced to 8.5% in older cows; in the present study, the difference in carcass values was 33.1 and 24.2% in young and older cows, respectively. In our study, the association between cow breed and both carcass price and value also differed by age of cow at slaughter, confirming that the superiority of dual-purpose cows was greatest when they were younger.…”
Section: Carcass Price and Value Of Culled Cowsmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…In a large-scale Irish survey, McHugh et al (2010) reported average total values of HF and SI cows similar to those found in the present study, although in their study, the cows were sold alive and were partly intended to be used for breeding rather than slaughtering. Compared to HF cows, SI cull cows have been reported to have heavier carcasses, better DP and a greater economic carcass value (Kaufmann et al, 1996). Similarly, Minchin et al (2009) found that cows sired by late maturing beef breeds (including SI) had heavier carcasses as well as better DP, carcass conformation and fatness than cows sired by HF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tagliapietra et al (2018) compared the effects of dam breed on Belgian Blue crossbred young bulls and heifers and found that the muscularity scores and some meat quality traits of the calves produced by cows of dual-purpose breeds (Simmental and Rendena) were better than those of a specialized dairy breed (Brown Swiss). Comparisons between purebred dairy and dual-purpose young cattle (Albertí et al, 2008), and between purebred dairy and dual-purpose cull cows (Kaufmann et al, 1996;Bazzoli et al, 2014;Gallo et al, 2017) provide some information on the expected effects on crossbred calves.…”
Section: Effects Of Dam Breed On the Performance Of Crossbred Calves ...mentioning
confidence: 99%