29Ureilites are among the most common achondrites and are widely believed to sample the mantle of a 30 single, now-disrupted, C-rich body. We analyzed 17 ureilite samples, mostly Antarctic finds, and determined 31 their incompatible trace element abundances. In order to remove or reduce the terrestrial contamination, 32 which is marked among Antarctic ureilites by light-REE enrichment, we leached the powdered samples with 33 nitric acid. The residues display consistent abundances, which strongly resemble those of the pristine rocks. 34All the analyzed samples display light-REE depletions, negative Eu anomalies, low (Sr/Eu*) n , and (Zr/Eu*) n 35 ratios which are correlated. Two groups of ureilites (groups A and B) are defined. Compared to group A, 36 group B ureilites, which are the less numerous, tend to be richer in heavy REEs, more light-REE depleted, 37 and display among the deepest Eu anomalies. In addition, olivine cores in group B ureilites tend to be more 38 forsteritic (Mg# = 81.9-95.2) than in group A ureilites (Mg# = 74.7-86.1). Incompatible trace element 39 systematics supports the view that ureilites are mantle restites. REE modelling suggests that their precursors 40were rather REE-rich (ca. 1.8-2 x CI) and contained a phosphate phase, possibly merrillite. The REE 41 abundances in ureilites can be explained if at least two distinct types of magmas were removed successively 42 from their precursors: aluminous and alkali-rich melts as exemplified by the Almahata Sitta trachyandesite 43 (ALM-A), and Al and alkali-poor melts produced after the exhaustion of plagioclase from the source. Partial 44 melting was near fractional (group B ureilites, which are probably among the least residual samples) to 45 dynamic with melt porosities that did not exceed a couple of percent (group A ureilites). The ureilite parent 46 body (UPB) was almost certainly covered by a crust formed chiefly from the extrusion products of the 47 aluminous and alkali-rich magmas. It is currently uncertain whether the Al and alkali-poor melts produced 48 during the second phase of melting reached the surface of the body. The fact that initial silicate melting of 49 ureilitic precursors would have produced relatively low density liquids capable of forming an external crust 50 to the UPB casts doubt on models that invoke chondritic outer layers to achondritic asteroids. 51 52 1. Introduction 53 54 55The early history of the Solar System was marked by the accretion of numerous asteroid-sized bodies 56 (large asteroids and embryos). Many of them underwent rapid internal heating, leading to melting and 57 subsequent differentiation. Among the most significant issues for understanding the differentiation of rocky 58 bodies are the exact processes of melting, the compositions of the generated magmas and how these were 59 then segregated from their sources. Melt migration may have involved ascent to the surface to form a crust, 60 or alternatively escape to space by explosive volcanism. It has recently been argued that partial melting...