1992
DOI: 10.1016/0304-3770(92)90027-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative contribution of different decay processes to the decomposition of Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) solms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
1
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…20% of detritus during in situ decomposition of E. azurea, which occurred within the first 24 hours of experiment (Stripari and Henry, 2002). In contrast to the literature, the leaching process lasted four to seven days (Singhal et al, 1992;Gupta et al, 1996) during decomposition of macrophytes. Dissolved compounds released during the first step of decomposition are predominantly nonstructural substances (organic and inorganic), with high potential for use by microbial metabolism (Wetzel, 1995).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…20% of detritus during in situ decomposition of E. azurea, which occurred within the first 24 hours of experiment (Stripari and Henry, 2002). In contrast to the literature, the leaching process lasted four to seven days (Singhal et al, 1992;Gupta et al, 1996) during decomposition of macrophytes. Dissolved compounds released during the first step of decomposition are predominantly nonstructural substances (organic and inorganic), with high potential for use by microbial metabolism (Wetzel, 1995).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…The primary net productivity of emergent aquatic macrophyte in freshwater systems and mangroves is often comparable to that from a rain forest; for instance, a value ranging from 19 to 37.5 Mg C ha -1 year -1 was reported for tropical freshwater emergent macrophytes (Wetzel, 2001), while for a tropical rain forest the primary net productivity varied from 1.7 to 21.7 Mg C ha -1 year -1 (Clark et al, 2001). Primary productivity of aquatic macrophyte is driven by abiotic and biotic processes such as temperature, solar radiation, nutrients, water velocity (Biudes and Camargo, 2008), ratio of herbivory (Lodge, 1991) and flooding pulse (Silva et al, 2009). Thus, these organisms are not only important to a high primary productivity or for their interactions with wildlife; they also play a major role in the cycling of various elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a biphasic decay pattern was previously observed in senescent and completely dead water hyacinth leaves Singhal et al, 1992). Rates of microbial decay of young water hyacinth leaves, however, are 4 and 12 times higher than that of senescent and completely dead water hyacinth leaves .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The speed of release the excretion to the environment was determined by the metabolism speed of water hyacinth, and TOC of 1 and 1' increased by physical leaching during the initial phase [13][14] of the experiment when the background was blank. The speed of water hyacinth assimilation was determined by the organic matter concentration of the environment, as the TOC increased so did the speed of water hyacinth assimilation.…”
Section: B Equilibrium Concentration A) Organic Matter Absorption Anmentioning
confidence: 99%