2023
DOI: 10.1007/s10336-023-02101-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative divergence of mobbing calls and songs structures in passerine birds

Mylène Dutour,
Thierry Lengagne,
Jean-Paul Léna

Abstract: Divergence and convergence in acoustic signals may be driven by different processes. Uncertainty about which of these processes best explains the patterns of acoustic variation between species has fuelled a long-standing debate in evolutionary biology. In particular, the features of acoustic signals are expected to vary according to their functional support. To compare the relative divergence of vocalizations according to their function, we examine two types of signals within 23 bird species, whilst controllin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 87 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This behavior is typically social, involving members of a group, other conspecifics, and sometimes heterospecifics (Coomes et al, 2019;Francis et al, 1989;Ostreiher, 2003). The emission of loud calls is a fundamental characteristic of avian mobbing (Ficken and Popp, 1996;Carlson and Griesser, 2022;Dutour et al, 2024). Research often examines the variety and rate of mobbing calls in response to different predators, but the identification of individual callers is less frequently noted (Stone and Trost, 1991;Baker and Becker, 2002;Griesser and Ekman, 2005;Griesser, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is typically social, involving members of a group, other conspecifics, and sometimes heterospecifics (Coomes et al, 2019;Francis et al, 1989;Ostreiher, 2003). The emission of loud calls is a fundamental characteristic of avian mobbing (Ficken and Popp, 1996;Carlson and Griesser, 2022;Dutour et al, 2024). Research often examines the variety and rate of mobbing calls in response to different predators, but the identification of individual callers is less frequently noted (Stone and Trost, 1991;Baker and Becker, 2002;Griesser and Ekman, 2005;Griesser, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%