1993
DOI: 10.2307/2426438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Effect of Litter and Forest Type on Rate of Decomposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Other investigations have implicated litter quality as the primary factor governing decomposition (Day, 1982;Elliot et al, 1993;Hobbie, 1996). Our results suggest that the importance of litter quality can be diminished when compared across a wide range of flooding regimes.…”
Section: Mass Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Other investigations have implicated litter quality as the primary factor governing decomposition (Day, 1982;Elliot et al, 1993;Hobbie, 1996). Our results suggest that the importance of litter quality can be diminished when compared across a wide range of flooding regimes.…”
Section: Mass Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Plants modify soil processes by their litterfall, the turn-over rate and absorption by the roots [14]. Different microbial and fungal populations are involved depending on the components to be broken down [11,13]. This demonstrates that even vegetation cover present in small quantities has some importance as it contributes different nutrients.…”
Section: Effect On Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nutrient regeneration resulting from decomposition of organic matter is a critical link for internal nutrient cycling in wetlands; decomposition returns nutrients to the system, provides an energy base for the detrital food web, contributes to the formation of soils and the accumulation of organic matter, and greatly influences productivity (Gambrell and Patrick 1978;Brinson 1981;Elliott et al 1993;Reddy and D'Angelo 1994;Mitsch and Gosselink 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%