2003
DOI: 10.1097/00146965-200306000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Electroconvulsive Therapy on Mood and Memory: A Neurocognitive Risk–Benefit Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we showed no correlation between mood improvement and cognitive improvement, suggesting that independent mechanisms were responsible for cognitive and mood changes. In accordance, it has been demonstrated that cortical stimulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation results in a cognitive improvement of some neuropsychological functions that is independent of the mood improvement [Hausmann et al, 2004;Moser et al, 2002;O'Connor et al, 2003]. An important consideration is that other electrode montages that may also result in an antidepressant effect, such as cathodal stimulation of the right DLPFC, were not tested in our study.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…In addition, we showed no correlation between mood improvement and cognitive improvement, suggesting that independent mechanisms were responsible for cognitive and mood changes. In accordance, it has been demonstrated that cortical stimulation with transcranial magnetic stimulation results in a cognitive improvement of some neuropsychological functions that is independent of the mood improvement [Hausmann et al, 2004;Moser et al, 2002;O'Connor et al, 2003]. An important consideration is that other electrode montages that may also result in an antidepressant effect, such as cathodal stimulation of the right DLPFC, were not tested in our study.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…9 Differences relative to studies documenting impaired processing speed and verbal and working memory after ECT, 17,39,40 or more global cognitive impairment, 41 might be due to the shorter interval between the last ECT session and posttreatment assessment in those studies. There is an active ongoing debate about the neurocognitive side effects of ECT, but they have not been investigated by randomized studies, with the exception of continuation ECT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Despite mixed results for healthy participants, a number of promising rTMS studies have shown beneficial WM effects in neuropsychiatric patients, both for depression (O'Connor et al 2003;Fabre et al 2004;Hausmann et al 2004;Schulze-Rauschenbach et al 2005;Boggio et al 2005;Kuroda et al 2006;Bloch et al 2008;Vanderhasselt et al 2009;Guse et al 2010) and schizophrenia (Demirtas-Tatlidede et al 2013;Levkovitz et al 2011;Barr et al 2013). Compromised cortical activity of neuropsychiatric patients, associated with hypo-dopaminergic states (Stahl 2013) and neurophysiological inhibitory deficits (Radhu et al 2013), may explain these findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%