2019
DOI: 10.1177/1464993419857887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative effects of trade liberalization on poverty: Evidence from Thailand

Abstract: Trade liberalization has long been expected to contribute to poverty reduction. The economy of Thailand provides an excellent case to study this relationship because its economy has structurally transformed in the past few decades through the export-oriented growth strategies. The purpose of this article is to examine the relative effect of Thailand’s accession to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1995 on poverty reduction, using a unique data set compiled from labour force survey and tariff data. Variatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the period from 1980 to 2014, the results showed that economic growth and manufacturing trade significantly reduced poverty while trade specialisation had adverse effects on poverty. Durongkaveroj and Ryu (2018) examined the effects of trade on poverty in Thailand. Using two-year data (1995 and 2005) from 76 provinces, the study showed that poverty reduced in provinces with more exposure to trade.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the period from 1980 to 2014, the results showed that economic growth and manufacturing trade significantly reduced poverty while trade specialisation had adverse effects on poverty. Durongkaveroj and Ryu (2018) examined the effects of trade on poverty in Thailand. Using two-year data (1995 and 2005) from 76 provinces, the study showed that poverty reduced in provinces with more exposure to trade.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With these methodological challenges, identifying causal impacts of trade openness on developmental outcomes such as poverty and inequality through natural experiment and strictly exogeneous instruments is preferred. However, this method is more appropriate for estimating the economic effects of exogeneous shocks in trade policy in a single‐country case study, for example, WTO accession (Durongkaveroj & Ryu, 2019; Kis‐Katos & Sparrow, 2015) or unexpected trade reform (Topalova, 2010).…”
Section: Robustness Checksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Competition is representative of the global research on enhanced trade liberalisation. Clustering analysis of keywords means summarising and grouping keywords to show which ones belong to the same research direction [7][8]. Cluster analysis was carried out on the field of trade liberalisation to produce a clustering and timeline map of keywords in the field of trade liberalisation from 2000-2022 (Figure 4), which has a cluster module value of 0.6818 > 0.3 and an average profile value of 0.8861 > 0.7, which can be considered a significant cluster structure and reasonable clustering results [9][10].…”
Section: Analysis Of Phased Frontier Research Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%