“…Although one study has recently reported a subgroup 1 rotavirus with a long electropherotype (NAKAGOMI et al, 1985), we have assumed that the electropherotypic analysis can be used to give a presumptive diagnosis of subgroup specificity, and have analysed the-clinical feat&es -of 'the two -groups. The one similar studv had shown no differences in severity of fever, vomifing or diarrhoea between the two subgroups, although the syndrome was thought to be of longer duration with subgroup 2 rotaviruses, which the authors suggested might indicate that subgroup 2 rotaviruses were more virulent (WHITE et al, 1984). In most studies of diarrhoea subgroup 2 roiavirusks predominate, again suggesting thit &ese viruses are more virulent (YOLKEN et al, 1978;WHITE et ul., 1984), although rotavirus subgroup i outbreaks have also been reported (ALBERT et al, 1983).…”