1999
DOI: 10.1051/aas:1999167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative intensity calibration of CDS-GIS detectors on SOHO using a plasma diagnostic technique

Abstract: Abstract. The internal intensity calibration of the Coronal Diagnostic Spectrometer (CDS) -Grazing Incidence Spectrometer (GIS) is studied using the Arcetri diagnostic method. A large number of spectral lines observed by the four GIS detectors in solar active and quiet regions is analysed in order to determine the relative intensity calibration curve of the instrument.The plasma diagnostic method developed in Arcetri allows the measurement of the correction factors to the preflight CDS -GIS internal intensity … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A few corrections were applied to the GIS data, as described in Landi et al (1999a). These corrections are also small, and do not usually exceed 1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A few corrections were applied to the GIS data, as described in Landi et al (1999a). These corrections are also small, and do not usually exceed 1%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding GIS, a preliminary in-flight study of the relative intensity calibration of the GIS detectors was performed by Landi et al (1999a). In this study, a quiet sun and an active region on-disc spectrum were used to check the relative averaged values of the pre-launch (Bromage et al 1996) calibration, assuming constant sensitivity across each detector.…”
Section: Background To the Cds Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These include de-biasing, flat-fielding, corrections for the burn-in of a few lines, nonlinear corrections, cosmic ray removal and correction for the tilt of the spectra (details may be found in Del Zanna et al 2001a). A few minor corrections were applied to the GIS data, as described in Landi et al (1999). Among the various detector effects, ghosting is one which can have a major impact on the validity of the derived intensity of an emission line.…”
Section: The Cds Instrument and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%