1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-1996(98)00021-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative labor productivity and the real exchange rate in the long run: evidence for a panel of OECD countries

Abstract: The Balassa-Samuelson model, which explains real exchange rate movements in terms of sectoral productivities, rests on two components. First, for a class of technologies including Cobb-Douglas, the model implies that the relative price of nontraded goods in each country should reflect the relative productivity of labor in the traded and nontraded goods sectors. Second, the model assumes that purchasing power parity holds for traded goods in the long-run. We test each of these implications using data from a pan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
177
0
7

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(195 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(17 reference statements)
11
177
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, employing CPI-based RERs, Jorion and Sweney (1996), Papell (1997Papell ( , 1998, Koedijk et al (1998) and Theodoridis (1997, 1998) claim that evidence for PPP is stronger from the mark series than from the corresponding dollar series. Canzoneri et al (1999) using the BalassaSamuelson model and Wei and Parsley (1995) reach a similar conclusion for tradable prices.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…For instance, employing CPI-based RERs, Jorion and Sweney (1996), Papell (1997Papell ( , 1998, Koedijk et al (1998) and Theodoridis (1997, 1998) claim that evidence for PPP is stronger from the mark series than from the corresponding dollar series. Canzoneri et al (1999) using the BalassaSamuelson model and Wei and Parsley (1995) reach a similar conclusion for tradable prices.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…We allocate sectors to the nontradables and tradables categories following Canzoneri et al (1999), Galstyan andObstfeld (2009). That is, real output in the nontradable sector is the sum of the real added value in 'Construction', 'Wholesale and Retail Trade', 'Hotels and Restaurants', 'Transport and Storage and Communication', 'Finance, Insurance, Real Estate and Business Services', 'Public Administration and Defence; Compulsory Social Security', 'Education', 'Health and Social Work' and 'Other Community, Social and Personal Services'.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since any of the above explanations may potentially drive the long-run behaviour of the internal real exchange rate, they rather serve as a warning for the interpretation of the results below. In any case, it is a well-established fact that, in the long run, sectoral productivity differentials tend to generate sectoral inflation differentials 4 .…”
Section: The Internal Equilibrium Real Exchange Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(17)3 See deGregorio et al (1994), for further discussion 4. See Alberola and Tyrväinen (1998) orCanzoneri et al (1999) 5. Alberola and Tyrväinen (1998) compute the shares of non-tradables in the CPI index for EMU countries and the range is between 62 and 72%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%