2020
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)ww.1943-5460.0000576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Magnitude of Infragravity Waves at Coastal Dikes with Shallow Foreshores: A Prediction Tool

Abstract: Despite the widely recognized role of infragravity (IG) waves in many often-hazardous nearshore processes, spectral wave models, which exclude IG-wave dynamics, are often used in the design and assessment of coastal dikes. Consequently, the safety of these structures in environments where IG waves dominate remains uncertain. Here, we combine physical and numerical modeling to: (1) assess the influence of various offshore, foreshore, and dike slope conditions on the dominance of IG waves over those at sea and s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Altomare et al [6] indicated, the combination of u and h is linked to the hazard rather than the single maximum values of one of these parameters. According to Suzuki et al [16], gentle and very shallow foreshore will result in flatter spectrum at the toe of the dike and thus spectral wave period T m-1,0 is much longer than ones in deep water conditions due to infragravity waves contribution [17]. In such a situation, the waves have been transformed into bores and therefore overtopping characteristics, namely, flow pattern on dikes /promenades, might be also different from one which toe is at deep water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As Altomare et al [6] indicated, the combination of u and h is linked to the hazard rather than the single maximum values of one of these parameters. According to Suzuki et al [16], gentle and very shallow foreshore will result in flatter spectrum at the toe of the dike and thus spectral wave period T m-1,0 is much longer than ones in deep water conditions due to infragravity waves contribution [17]. In such a situation, the waves have been transformed into bores and therefore overtopping characteristics, namely, flow pattern on dikes /promenades, might be also different from one which toe is at deep water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition to the general sensitivity of damage curves to topographic data quality, the damage curves displayed in Figure 7 do not consider certain physical wave-driven phenomena such as wave overtopping of structures (Lashley et al, 2020a) or infragravity waves generated by waves breaking in shallow water (Roeber and Bricker, 2015). For instance Lashley et al (2019) discussed the importance of dike overtopping due to infragravity waves on nearshore developments that can induce wave-driven coastal inundation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Influence on Significant Wave Height at Toe Lashley et al (2020a) investigated the influence of various dike-foreshore parameters on wave conditions at the dike toe using the XBeach non-hydrostatic numerical model (Kingsday release) in both 1D and 2D mode. In each simulation, the offshore wave height ( 0, ), offshore spectral wave period ( −1,0, ), wave directional spreading ( ), water depth at the toe (ℎ ), foreshore slope ( ), width of vegetated cover ( ) and structure slope ( ) were systematically varied, following a one-[factor]-at-a-time (OAT approach).…”
Section: Empirical Formulae For the Influence Of Ig Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ̅ , ̅ ℎ , ̅ , ̅ , ̅ are influence factors for wave directional spreading, water depth at the toe, foreshore slope, vegetated cover and structure slope, respectively; see Lashley et al (2020a) for further details on how each influence factor is determined.…”
Section: Empirical Formulae For the Influence Of Ig Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation