2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.0267-4424.2006.00403.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Performance Evaluation in Swedish Local Government

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
29
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, in order to obtain the desired benefits, managers should be willing to use the information and even to compare themselves with other entities. So, the obligatory use of this information is not sufficient: it is necessary to bring about a change from the management point of view, as has been done in countries such as Norway (Jonhsen and Vakkuri, 2008) and Sweden (Siverbo and Johanson, ; and Johanson and Siverbo, ) where these indicators are voluntary and the entities participate voluntarily in benchmarking processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, in order to obtain the desired benefits, managers should be willing to use the information and even to compare themselves with other entities. So, the obligatory use of this information is not sufficient: it is necessary to bring about a change from the management point of view, as has been done in countries such as Norway (Jonhsen and Vakkuri, 2008) and Sweden (Siverbo and Johanson, ; and Johanson and Siverbo, ) where these indicators are voluntary and the entities participate voluntarily in benchmarking processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Sweden, local governments use their own self‐developed models, although state initiatives have been taken to make it easier for local governments to mutually compare their performance and many of the performance evaluations performed in the Swedish municipalities involve comparison with other municipalities, which increases the potentialities and usefulness of the measures (Siverbo and Johansson, ; and Johanson and Siverbo, ).…”
Section: The Benefits Of Performance Reporting In Practice: An Internmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work on the roles of management control in public sector organisations points in the same direction, as it emphasises how instrumental rationalities guiding action are not necessarily inconsistent with the values that motivate symbolic actions and decoupling in such organisations (Lounsbury, ; and Modell, ). Public sector agencies might maintain legitimacy towards ambiguous measures and at the same time act according to efficiency‐seeking rationalities (van Helden and Tillerma, ; and Siverbo and Johansson, ). These findings illustrate that some institutionally conditioned management control changes (like the introduction of performance management systems available to clinical departments) may be embedded in forms of logic which reflect instrumental rationalities while at the same time giving rise to diverse practices, due to the different strategies expressed by key actors.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of changes in public organisations have often emphasised that another management rationale prevails in public companies and that public sector companies often only ceremonially implement new control tools. Consequently, it is, as Siverbo and Johansson (2006) point out, difficult to determine whether benchmarking-based control models affect organisations or whether the models are decoupled from practice. The interviews in this paper, however, show that the benchmarking model affects the managerial rationales and that actual changes appear to be initiated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%