1991
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)93126-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative prevalence and risk factors of HTLV-I and HTLV-II infection in US blood donors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
1
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
30
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This data is clearly different from what has been previously reported by Brites et al (1997) in Salvador, State of Bahia, relating such coinfections with previous blood transfusion and the use of intravenous drugs, similarly to transmission reported in other parts of the world (Lee et al 1991). On the other hand, this is the first time that HTLV-II is detected in a higher frequency than HTLV-I in a Brazilian urban setting coinfecting HIV carriers and AIDS patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…This data is clearly different from what has been previously reported by Brites et al (1997) in Salvador, State of Bahia, relating such coinfections with previous blood transfusion and the use of intravenous drugs, similarly to transmission reported in other parts of the world (Lee et al 1991). On the other hand, this is the first time that HTLV-II is detected in a higher frequency than HTLV-I in a Brazilian urban setting coinfecting HIV carriers and AIDS patients.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…et al., 1990;Lee et al, 1991;Hjelle &Chaney, 1992). Endemic HTLV-II infection has been reported among Guaymi Indians in Panama (Lairmore et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in the United States the prevalence of infection with HTLV-I appears to be quite low, blood used for transfusion is nevertheless being tested routinely by enzyme-linked immunosorbent (ELISA) and͞or Western blot assays (7,8). On this basis, the prevalence of HTLV-I infection among Americans without obvious risk factors, such as origin from an endemic region or intravenous drug abuse has been estimated to be about 0.016% (9). It may be as high as 0.1% in some locations (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%