O ngoing viral evolution may generate important phenotypic variants, including strains that differ in host range, transmission mechanisms and efficiency, tissue tropism, antigenicity, and/or virulence. Although these novel biological functions often require multiple and concerted genomic changes, how such combinations of mutations can arise and be favored by natural selection is unclear. The complexity of the evolutionary pathways leading to the appearance of phenotypic variants is compounded when they alter the host range of viruses, as mutations may have different fitness consequences in different host species (24,27,32). Mutations may also be subject to complex selection pressures in the same host when, for example, receptor binding and antibody recognition sites overlap on the viral capsid, so that selection pressures differ between immunologically naïve and immune individuals (31). Understanding the processes by which viruses acquire new phenotypes in the face of such complex selective environments is critical for improving the prediction, prevention, and control strategies for emerging viral diseases.Feline panleukopenia virus (FPV) and closely related viruses that infect many hosts within the order Carnivora have undergone processes of cross-species transmission and adaptation during the last 3 decades, providing a powerful opportunity to examine the evolution and adaptation of a novel pandemic virus in the context of new host environments. Canine parvovirus type 2 (CPV-2) is a host-range variant of a virus closely related to FPV that gained the ability to infect dogs through the acquisition of capsid mutations that altered the interaction of virus capsids with the transferrin receptor type 1 (TfR) on the surface of canine cells (14,29). CPV-2 was the original virus strain in dogs that spread worldwide during 1978 and that was completely replaced during 1979 and 1980 by a new variant (CPV-2a). The CPV-2a strain is genetically and antigenically distinct from CPV-2 (17, 22) and is presumably better adapted to its canine host since it replaced CPV-2 in nature. It is now clear that the emergence of CPV involved a number of hostswitching events between cats, dogs, raccoons, and possibly other carnivores, with multiple transfers occurring among the different hosts (2). While the emergence of CPV-2a was previously attributed to host adaptation in dogs, recent studies have shown that this adaptive process likely involved transfer of CPV-2a to and from raccoons (2). Raccoon infection also involved a host-range change in the virus, as the raccoon viruses lost the canine host range and appeared to carry host-specific mutations that were likely adaptive for raccoons (2). The emergence of CPV-2a also involved a host-range expansion, as the original CPV-2 did not replicate in cats, while CPV-2a isolates replicated efficiently and caused disease in cats (28). This represented a novel hostadaptation event, as CPV-2a did not show significant reversion back to the original FPV sequences (28). CPV-2a isolates also showed al...