2016
DOI: 10.4310/jsg.2016.v14.n1.a11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative quasimorphisms and stably unbounded norms on the group of symplectomorphisms of the Euclidean spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This answers an open problem from the paper by Burago, Ivanov and Polterovich [3]. Another example for the same problem has been recently provided by Kawasaki [7] who showed that the group of symplectic diffeomorphisms of the Euclidean space is stably unbounded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This answers an open problem from the paper by Burago, Ivanov and Polterovich [3]. Another example for the same problem has been recently provided by Kawasaki [7] who showed that the group of symplectic diffeomorphisms of the Euclidean space is stably unbounded.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The definitions of (ν, p, q)-commutator length and ν-quasimorphisms are following. 4]). Let G be a group with a conjugation-invariant norm ν and p, q ∈ R >0 .…”
Section: Proofs Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brandenbursky and Kȩdra [1] proved the following theorem: Kawasaki [4] also showed that the commutator subgroup of Symp c (R 2n ) 0 is such a group, where Symp c (R 2n ) 0 is the group of symplectomorphisms with compact support isotopic to the identity of the standard symplectic space. In this paper, we give a proof of Theorem1.2 by using the idea of Kawasaki in [4]. Kawasaki introduced ν-quasimorphisms (or relative quasimorphisms) and the (ν, p, q)-commutator length cl ν,p,q .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the idea of the technique in Proposition 4.4 comes from the construction of relative quasimorphisms by Kawasaki [11] and Brandenbursky and Kȩdra [3]. Moreover, our construction also can be seen as a generalization of [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%