IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477)
DOI: 10.1109/igarss.2003.1294874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative radiometric normalisation of multitemporal Landsat data-a comparison of different approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of the radiometric correction was confirmed using an inter-calibration algorithm between the NDVI images over a test area of the study site. Among the numerous radiometric normalization approaches specific to Landsat data (Elvidge et al 1995, Jensen 1996, Yuan & Elvidge 1996, Yang & Lo 2000, Callahan 2001, Over et al 2003, Mateos et al 2010, we selected the intercalibration algorithm, defined as no-change (NC) regression normalization, which has already been applied over areas characterized by very complex landscape patterns (Simoniello et al 2008). Comparisons of results between the dark object subtraction model and the inter-calibration algorithm of NC regression normalization showed no significant differences in change detection over forest areas between the two methods.…”
Section: Image Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of the radiometric correction was confirmed using an inter-calibration algorithm between the NDVI images over a test area of the study site. Among the numerous radiometric normalization approaches specific to Landsat data (Elvidge et al 1995, Jensen 1996, Yuan & Elvidge 1996, Yang & Lo 2000, Callahan 2001, Over et al 2003, Mateos et al 2010, we selected the intercalibration algorithm, defined as no-change (NC) regression normalization, which has already been applied over areas characterized by very complex landscape patterns (Simoniello et al 2008). Comparisons of results between the dark object subtraction model and the inter-calibration algorithm of NC regression normalization showed no significant differences in change detection over forest areas between the two methods.…”
Section: Image Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of PIFs used in radiometric correction studies vary from a few dozens (Eckhart et al 1990;Schroeder et al, 2006) to several hundreds (Over et al, 2003;Janzen et al, 2006;Galiatsatos et al, 2007). In this study, only four types of invariant features covering at least 2x2 pixels and providing a number of independent replicates sufficient for statistical analyses were available on all images (Fig.…”
Section: Pseudo-invariant Features (Pifs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that context the block-wide radiometric normalization is often called 'radiometric aerial triangulation' because of various similarities to a geometric aerial triangulation. Surveys on radiometric normalization approaches can be found in, e.g., Yang and Lo (2000), Over et al (2003), Hong (2007), Gehrke (2010) and Pros et al (2013), which discuss and, in parts, compare approaches for histogram adaptation, retrieval and evaluation of radiometric tie points ('invariant features') as well as computational aspects.…”
Section: Recent Developments In Radiometric Normalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%