2016
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11660
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative rate and location of intra-host HIV evolution to evade cellular immunity are predictable

Abstract: Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) evolves within infected persons to escape being destroyed by the host immune system, thereby preventing effective immune control of infection. Here, we combine methods from evolutionary dynamics and statistical physics to simulate in vivo HIV sequence evolution, predicting the relative rate of escape and the location of escape mutations in response to T-cell-mediated immune pressure in a cohort of 17 persons with acute HIV infection. Predicted and clinically observed times to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
202
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
11
202
2
Order By: Relevance
“…doi:10.1093/molbev/msx095 MBE although very important, the information conveyed by pairs of primary and accessory mutations only tells a small part of the story; the context of the full sequence background is really necessary to understand how primary resistance mutations become stabilized. The results presented here advance recent work in the field, using Potts models to study HIV-1 evolution (Barton et al 2016b;Butler et al 2016), by providing systematic prospective predictions quantifying the influence of specific multi-residue patterns on the tolerance of drug resistance mutations. Recent publications have reported that mutations near or distal to Gag cleavage sites play a role in promoting cleavage by drug-resistant and enzymatically deficient proteases, by selecting for mutations that increase substrate contacts with the protease active site, altering the flexibility of the cleavage site vicinity, or by as of yet unknown mechanisms Kolli et al 2009;Breuer et al 2011;Parry et al 2011;Fun et al 2012;Flynn et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…doi:10.1093/molbev/msx095 MBE although very important, the information conveyed by pairs of primary and accessory mutations only tells a small part of the story; the context of the full sequence background is really necessary to understand how primary resistance mutations become stabilized. The results presented here advance recent work in the field, using Potts models to study HIV-1 evolution (Barton et al 2016b;Butler et al 2016), by providing systematic prospective predictions quantifying the influence of specific multi-residue patterns on the tolerance of drug resistance mutations. Recent publications have reported that mutations near or distal to Gag cleavage sites play a role in promoting cleavage by drug-resistant and enzymatically deficient proteases, by selecting for mutations that increase substrate contacts with the protease active site, altering the flexibility of the cleavage site vicinity, or by as of yet unknown mechanisms Kolli et al 2009;Breuer et al 2011;Parry et al 2011;Fun et al 2012;Flynn et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The primary mutations are destabilizing in the context of the wildtype background, but become stabilizing on average as other resistance mutations accumulate in the background, similar to the concept of entrenchment in systems biology (Pollock et al 2012;Gong et al 2013;Shah et al 2015). Furthermore, we find that entrenchment is modulated by the collective effect of the entire sequence, including mutations at polymorphic residues, and the variance of the statistical energy cost of introducing a primary mutation increases as resistance mutations accumulate; this heterogeneity is another manifestation of epistasis (McCandlish et al , 2016Barton et al 2016b). These findings provide a framework for exploring mutational resistance mechanisms using probabilistic models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations