Relative skull size as one of the factors limiting skull shape variation in passerines

Abstract

Despite a considerable interest of researchers to the issue of variation in skull shapes of birds and factors influencing it, some drivers associated with the design features of an entire bird body, which are important for both successful terrestrial locomotion and flight, are overlooked. One of such factors, in our opinion, is relative skull size (skull length in relation to body mass), which can affect the position of the body's center of gravity. We tested effects of relative skull size, allometry (i.e. absolute skull size), and diet on variation in skull shape. The study was conducted on 50 songbird species with a wide range of body mass (8.3g to 570g) and dietary preferences (granivores, insectivores/granivores, insectivores, omnivores). Skull shape was analyzed using 2D geometric morphometrics. We revealed that similar patterns of skull shape occur among passerines with different body sizes and diets. The relative skull size predicted skull shape to a similar extent and with a similar pattern as the absolute size. In our opinion, the effect of the relative skull size on skull shape variation is likely due to biomechanical constraints related to flight.

Relative skull size evolution in Mesozoic archosauromorphs: potential drivers and morphological uniqueness of erythrosuchid archosauriforms

“…2012; Foth et al . 2015; Shatkovska & Ghazali 2021). Femoral length was our chosen proxy for overall body size because while femur circumference scales more closely with body mass (Campione & Evans 2012; Campione et al .…”

How smart wasT. rex? Testing claims of exceptional cognition in dinosaurs and the application of neuron count estimates in palaeontological research

“…Alternatively, the emergence of volancy in small stem-birds similar to Archaeopteryx might have driven the evolution of elevated neuron densities, since active flight likely imposes constraints on skull and brain size (Olkowicz et al, 2016;Shatkovska & Ghazali, 2021).…”

“…These include bizarre animals such as the immense ornithomimosaur Deinocheirus mirificus (∼ 7 t), the scythe-clawed Therizinosaurus cheloniformis (∼ 5 t) and the giant oviraptorosaur Gigantoraptor erlianensis (∼ 2 t). Alternatively, the emergence of volancy in small maniraptoriforms similar to Archaeopteryx might have driven the evolution of elevated neuron densities, since active flight likely imposes constraints on skull and brain size (Olkowicz et al, 2016; Shatkovska & Ghazali, 2021). However, the lack of reliable morphological markers to infer neuron density renders all these notions speculative.…”

Vocal tract shape variation contributes to individual vocal identity in African penguins

“…To use it in the models and in all computational aspects of the work, we manually placed the structures in the natural phonatory position and extracted the relevant measurements with a calliper. Finally, for each bird, we measured the inter-skull length (ISL) as a proxy of the skeletal dimension [49,50]. All the measurements were taken by the same person (A.S.) using a digital calliper accurate to 0.005 mm.…”