1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-1280(96)04704-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative stabilities and conformational ring inversion potentials in heterocyclic decalin systems and stereoelectronic implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
13
4

Year Published

1999
1999
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
13
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For 1-oxadecalin 2, the cis2 form is calculated to be 10.9 kJ mol À1 more stable than its diastereomer cis1, in good agreement with the respective MM3 energy difference, 9.6 kJ mol À1 , of Golender et al, [5] as well as with an experimental Gibbs energy difference of 8.8 kJ mol À1 in a CDCl 3 -CFCl 3 mixture at À708. [12,13] Thus, the cis isomer of 2 favors a structure in which the C9-O bond is projected axially from the cyclohexane ring (the 'O-inside' structure [5] ), contrary to the other structural alternative in which the bond concerned is equatorial.…”
Section: Mono-and Dioxadecalinssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For 1-oxadecalin 2, the cis2 form is calculated to be 10.9 kJ mol À1 more stable than its diastereomer cis1, in good agreement with the respective MM3 energy difference, 9.6 kJ mol À1 , of Golender et al, [5] as well as with an experimental Gibbs energy difference of 8.8 kJ mol À1 in a CDCl 3 -CFCl 3 mixture at À708. [12,13] Thus, the cis isomer of 2 favors a structure in which the C9-O bond is projected axially from the cyclohexane ring (the 'O-inside' structure [5] ), contrary to the other structural alternative in which the bond concerned is equatorial.…”
Section: Mono-and Dioxadecalinssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…For 1-oxadecalin 2, the cis2 form is calculated to be 10.9 kJ mol À1 more stable than its diastereomer cis1, in good agreement with the respective MM3 energy difference, 9.6 kJ mol À1 , of Golender et al, [5] as well as with an experimental Gibbs energy difference of 8.8 kJ mol À1 in a CDCl 3 -CFCl 3 mixture at À708. [12,13] Thus, the cis isomer of 2 favors a structure in which the C9-O bond is projected axially from the cyclohexane ring (the 'O-inside' structure [5] ), contrary to the other structural alternative in which the bond concerned is equatorial. The calculated cis-trans stability difference (Table 2), 4.8 kJ mol À1 (7.1 kJ mol À1 according to MM3 [5] ) in 2, is markedly smaller than that in 1 for obvious reasons: the axial O atom of 2c2 has a more favorable synaxial interaction with the axial H atoms of the cyclohexane ring than an axial CH 2 group in 1c.…”
Section: Mono-and Dioxadecalinssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11 for the NIR transition state) but the still used MM2 program has no tool to prove whether this structure is a transition state and obviously whether it is the first-order transition state. In contrast, convenient features of the MM3 package, namely full matrix minimization option as well as normal mode vibrational analysis, permit one to find transition states on conformational pathways and also to determine their order 10,16,17 and to establish formal genetic relationships between these transition states and the corresponding conformers. 4,7 Therefore, in order to prove 'the third type of amines' concept and to reveal characteristic features for these amines, we have undertaken an MM3-assisted search and analysis of other systems of this type.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%