2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmva.2000.1946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Stability for Strictly Stationary Sequences

Abstract: For a nonnegative strictly stationary random sequence satisfying the``minimal'' dependence condition necessary and sufficient conditions for the relative stability are found. As an application the well-known Khinchine stability result for i.i.d. random variables is proved for uniformly strong mixing sequences. AcademicPress AMS 1991 subject classification: 60F05; 60G10.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, we no longer have to assume that condition ( * ) on page 56 of [32] is satisfied. By Theorem 3 and the results in [35] we get that functionals of digits in continued fraction expansion satisfy the Raikov principle (Cf. Twierdzenie 4, §28, Ch.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, we no longer have to assume that condition ( * ) on page 56 of [32] is satisfied. By Theorem 3 and the results in [35] we get that functionals of digits in continued fraction expansion satisfy the Raikov principle (Cf. Twierdzenie 4, §28, Ch.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…[7]). Since n ln 2P[ On the other hand, by Theorem 4 in [35], the convergence in probability cannot be replaced by the almost sure one.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For positive random variables {X k } with the canonical normalization and r = 1 we may drop restrictions on ϕ 1 (cf. [61], p. 247). Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 yield in this case the following stability result (cf.…”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Theorem 1 and Theorem 2 yield in this case the following stability result (cf. [35], [19], [54], [45] and [61], [62]). …”
Section: Introduction and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In view of the proof of Theorem 3 in [61] it suffices to prove that (iii) entails (i). The condition (iii) and (31) give…”
Section: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 93%