Relative susceptibility of different mungbean varieties to Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

Khattak, Shahid; Hamed, Muhammad; Khatoon, R; Mohammad, Tila

doi:10.1016/0022-474x(87)90041-5

Cited by 22 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Callosobruchus species are economically important bruchid pests of grain legumes such as Vigna unguiculata (L.) (cowpea), V. radiata (L.) (mungbean), V. subterranean (L.) (bambara groundnuts), Cicer arietinum (L.) (chickpea) and Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (pigeon pea) 1–4. Infestation by these bruchids reduces the value of grain through weight loss, increased mould growth and changes to the aesthetic value of the grains (their eggs and adult emergence holes render the seeds unsightly) 5, 6.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variation in the sensitivity of Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) acetylcholinesterase to the organophosphate insecticide malaoxon: effect of species, geographical strain and food type

Gbaye

Holloway

Callaghan

2012

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Variation in the sensitivity of Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) acetylcholinesterase to the organophosphate insecticide malaoxon: effect of species, geographical strain and food type

Gbaye

Holloway

Callaghan

2012

Pest Management Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(pigeon pea) and Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdcourt (bambara groundnuts), just to mention a few (Chandrakantha and Mathavan 1986; Daglish et al. 1993; Khattak et al. 1987; Ofuya 2001; Southgate 1978).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…C. maculatus has also been reported as a pest of other legumes such as Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek (mungbean), Cicer arietinum (L.) (chickpea), Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. (pigeon pea) and Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdcourt (bambara groundnuts), just to mention a few (Chandrakantha and Mathavan 1986;Daglish et al 1993;Khattak et al 1987;Ofuya 2001;Southgate 1978).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Synergistic effects of geographical strain, temperature and larval food on insecticide tolerance in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)

Gbaye

Millard

Holloway

2011

J Applied Entomology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study investigated the multifactorial interaction of various environmental factors including geographical strain (Brazil, Cameroon and Yemen strains), temperature, dose and larval food (cowpea and mungbean) on the response of Callosobruchus maculatus adult to insecticide. All the main factors, their two‐way interactions and the four‐way interaction had significant effects on C. maculatus response to malathion (an organophosphate insecticide). However, the three‐way interactions were not statistically significant (except strain × food × dose, P = 0.002). The Brazil strain was the most responsive to temperature irrespective of the larval food type. The impact of food type differs from one strain to the other; for instance, the food that imparts higher tolerance in a strain might reduce the tolerance in another. Likewise, the hierarchy of tolerance among the cowpea‐reared strains (Brazil > Cameroon > Yemen) was totally different from that of the mungbean‐reared strains (Cameroon > Yemen > Brazil). The reasons for these differences were discussed in the light of their impact on C. maculatus management. Both the management of C. maculatus and development of resistance could be complex; hence, the states of a variety of environmental factors need to be considered. This is necessary to maximize management success of this bruchid, especially in tropical/subtropical developing countries.

show abstract

“…The susceptibility of mung bean varieties to Callosobruchus was studied at different places (Khattak et al, 1987, Raghvani et al, 2001, Shafique and Ahmad, 2002and Chakraborty et al, 2004 earlier. Pankaj and Singh (2011) revealed that seed characters such as size, colour, shape, volume and texture of seed coat did not perform any significant role in oviposition preference of C. chinensis in stored mung bean.…”

Section: Categorization Of Varieties For Their Susceptibility To C Cmentioning

confidence: 99%

Susceptibility of mung bean varieties to Callosobruchus chinensis under storage conditions

Parmar

Patel

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Investigations were carried out during 2013 on mung bean for their susceptibility against Callosobruchus chinensis L. under storage. Among the mung bean varieties; Vishal, Samrat, GM-3, GM-4 and K-851 were found resistant based on oviposition preference (7.97/20 seeds, 8.74, 8.99, 9.17 and 9.49, respectively), population growth (345.09, 371.99, 397.50, 405.52, and 437.56, respectively), per cent weight loss (6.11%, 7.43%, 8.08%, 9.28% and 11.04%, respectively) and per cent germination loss (29.27%, 36.03%, 34.91%, 40.36% and 40.42%, respectively) against C. chinensis. Variety VMS-6 was also found resistant based on oviposition preference (9.61), population growth (437.56) and germination loss (43.87%) whereas GM-2 was resistant based on oviposition preference (10.72).

show abstract

Relative susceptibility of different mungbean varieties to Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)

Cited by 22 publications

References 4 publications

Variation in the sensitivity of Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) acetylcholinesterase to the organophosphate insecticide malaoxon: effect of species, geographical strain and food type

Variation in the sensitivity of Callosobruchus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) acetylcholinesterase to the organophosphate insecticide malaoxon: effect of species, geographical strain and food type

Synergistic effects of geographical strain, temperature and larval food on insecticide tolerance in Callosobruchus maculatus (F.)

Susceptibility of mung bean varieties to Callosobruchus chinensis under storage conditions

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About