Relative train length and the infrastructure required to mitigate delays from operating combinations of normal and over-length freight trains on single-track railway lines in North America

Abstract

Distributed power locomotives have facilitated longer heavy-haul freight trains that improve the efficiency of railway operations. In North America, where the majority of mainlines are single track, the potential operational and economic advantages of long trains are limited by the inadequate length of many existing passing sidings (passing loops). To alleviate the challenge of operating trains that exceed the length of passing sidings, railways preserve the mainline capacity by extending passing sidings. However, industry practitioners rarely optimize the extent of infrastructure investment for the volume of over-length train traffic on a particular route. This paper investigates how different combinations of normal and over-length trains, and their relative lengths, relate to the number of siding extensions necessary to mitigate the delay performance of over-length train operation on a single-track rail corridor. The experiments used Rail Traffic Controller simulation software to determine train delay for various combinations of short and long train lengths under different directional distributions of a given daily railcar throughput volume. Simulation results suggest a relationship between the ratio of train lengths and the infrastructure expansion required to eliminate the delay introduced by operating over-length trains on the initial route. Over-length trains exhibit delay benefits from siding extensions while short trains are relatively insensitive to the expanded infrastructure. Assigning directional preference to over-length trains improves the overall average long-train delay at the expense of delay to short trains. These results will allow railway practitioners to make more informed decisions on the optimal incremental capital expansion strategy for the operation of over-length trains.

Industry 4.0 Technologies Applied to the Rail Transportation Industry: A Systematic Review

“…Usually, solutions created for this field are tested with real data through the use of realistic software simulators that allow them to tune the proposed methods and get conclusions about the research. In [ 84 ], authors proposed a method where they used a software simulator for train transport called Rail Traffic Controller (RTC) [ 133 ]. This simulator allowed them to study the relationship between trains that exceed the length of passing sidings and the train delays in single-track rail corridors.…”

Analysis of the barriers to multimodal freight transport and their mitigation strategies

“…However, faster and longer freight trains might face some infrastructural and operational constraints. For example, emergency braking on switches could lead to the risk of derailment while loss of grip can happen when restarting from a standstill on steep railway lines [73,74] and another constraint is the inadequate length of many existing passing sidings [75]. While freight trains are faster, the average speed would be between 50 and 60 km/hr because of the relatively long dwell times at terminals and weak cooperation among the national infrastructure operators [69,70].…”

Balancing the Service Benefits and Mainline Delay Disbenefits of Operating Shorter Freight Trains

“…Increasing power-to-weight ratio and adding second track had fewer delay reduction benefits compared with the incremental costs. Dick et al (49) examined the siding infrastructure necessary to manage traffic flows consisting of different combinations of ''short'' trains and ''long'' trains exceeding the length of existing sidings. Simulations were run under three-aspect fixed blocks only and found that, for a given track infrastructure, operating more railcars in long trains results in lower average train delay.…”