“…(iii) Finally, in Phase III, the set of admissible actions is provided to the performance-oriented component of the RAS supervisor in order to select the one that will be communicated eventually to the RAS environment, in a way that observes some performance considerations. In addition to this basic functionality, the RAS controller should be able to respond to the various contingencies taking place in the RAS domain, by (i) appropriately updating the RAS configuration database, and (ii) revising 4 As demonstrated by the examples presented in Figures 1 and 2, this "hold-while-waiting" effect frequently results from the need to physically buffer the various process instances at any single point in time, i.e., parts processed in a flexibly automated production system or vehicles in an AGV network are physical entities and they always need to be accommodated somewhere during their sojourn through the system. It must be noticed, however, that, while providing the necessary specificity for the underlying resource allocation dynamics, the aforestated assumptions do not compromise the modeling power of our framework, since one can capture any additional resource allocation dynamics by augmenting the specification of process Π j .…”