2011
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Value of Clinical, Laboratory and Imaging Tools in Diagnosing Pediatric Acute Appendicitis

Abstract: The results of laboratory tests (WBC, neutrophils) and imaging (US) contributed far more than clinical signs and symptoms (pain duration, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, and peritoneal signs at first physical examination) to the correct diagnosis of AA in children. When these 3 parameters were positive, the probability of a false positive (normal appendix) was only 1%. The contribution of US was particularly high as it was used primarily in patients in whom the diagnosis was in doubt and its results matched the fin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
7
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
7
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite several well‐known limitations such as low visualizability, probability of false‐positive or ‐negative findings in obese children and operator dependence, comprehensive studies have reported both high sensitivity and specificity for US in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Sensitivity and specificity in the literature range between 87 and 100%, and between 15 and 95%, respectively . In the present study, the sensitivity of US alone was 88.2%, while the specificity was 66.7%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Despite several well‐known limitations such as low visualizability, probability of false‐positive or ‐negative findings in obese children and operator dependence, comprehensive studies have reported both high sensitivity and specificity for US in the diagnosis of appendicitis. Sensitivity and specificity in the literature range between 87 and 100%, and between 15 and 95%, respectively . In the present study, the sensitivity of US alone was 88.2%, while the specificity was 66.7%.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Similarly, the rate of postoperative infections was comparable between both cohorts (P = .8). Contrary to our findings, previous studies reported that obesity was a risk factor for longer hospitalization and increased rates of postoperative infections in children with PA. 13,24 The main limitation of our study is its retrospective nature. Certainly, a prospective trial using comparable diagnostic algorithms for children with suspected appendicitis would appropriately clarify if PA is more prevalent in children with obesity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[14][15][16] At the same time, with higher TLC values in a clinical setting for appendicitis, a complicated form or higher grade of severity is more likely. Misdiagnosis in these subsets of patients are potentially higher putting them at risk if TLC alone is unrealistically depended upon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%