1959
DOI: 10.1109/ire-i.1959.5006830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative Voltmeter for VHF/UHF Signal Generator Attenuator Calibration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…G OOD I N S E R T I O N loss m e a s u r e m e n t accuracies have been achieved a t fixed frequencies by manually operated systems [l]- [3], [12] using t h e parallel I F substitution method. Inaccuracies a r e reduced by 1) t u n i n g of source and load impedances, 2) using a precision waveguide-below-cutoff attenuator as I F substitution s t a n d a r d [3]- [5], and 3) close control of environmental t e m p e r a t u r e and performing of measurement after thermal equilibrium is reached.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…G OOD I N S E R T I O N loss m e a s u r e m e n t accuracies have been achieved a t fixed frequencies by manually operated systems [l]- [3], [12] using t h e parallel I F substitution method. Inaccuracies a r e reduced by 1) t u n i n g of source and load impedances, 2) using a precision waveguide-below-cutoff attenuator as I F substitution s t a n d a r d [3]- [5], and 3) close control of environmental t e m p e r a t u r e and performing of measurement after thermal equilibrium is reached.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inaccuracies a r e reduced by 1) t u n i n g of source and load impedances, 2) using a precision waveguide-below-cutoff attenuator as I F substitution s t a n d a r d [3]- [5], and 3) close control of environmental t e m p e r a t u r e and performing of measurement after thermal equilibrium is reached.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been determined experimentally that -for a range of at least 80 dB, such deviations remain less than 0.01 dB if the signal power in the mixer is always at least 30 dB below the local oscillator power in the mixer. Some analysis of this error has appeared [37,38] but additional work will be needed if aU other sources of error in this method are reduced to the point where 0.001 dB is a significant amount of error.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%