1970
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(70)90816-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relative X-ray transition probabilities to the K-shell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
18
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
6
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the exception of the values by Kaastra & Mewe (1993), theory predicts a decrease of the ratio with N, and the theoretical scatter is comparable with that among the solid-state experiments of just under 20%. The computed results by , - and Jacobs & Rozsnyai (1986) for N = 25 are in good agreement with the bulk of the experimental values (Perujo et al 1987;Rao et al 1986;Berényi et al 1978;Salem et al 1972;Slivinsky & Ebert 1972;Hansen et al 1970). Hölzer et al (1997) mention a possible systematic deviation in one of their corrections to explain the discrepancy of their data with other measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the exception of the values by Kaastra & Mewe (1993), theory predicts a decrease of the ratio with N, and the theoretical scatter is comparable with that among the solid-state experiments of just under 20%. The computed results by , - and Jacobs & Rozsnyai (1986) for N = 25 are in good agreement with the bulk of the experimental values (Perujo et al 1987;Rao et al 1986;Berényi et al 1978;Salem et al 1972;Slivinsky & Ebert 1972;Hansen et al 1970). Hölzer et al (1997) mention a possible systematic deviation in one of their corrections to explain the discrepancy of their data with other measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…2, theoretical and experimental Kβ/Kα intensity ratios are plotted as a function of electron number. Most experimental ratios (Rao et al 1986;Berényi et al 1978;Salem et al 1972;Slivinsky & Ebert 1972;Hansen et al 1970) have been scaled down by 8.8% in order to extract the radiative-Auger (5%) and Kβ 5 (3.8%) satellite contributions from the Kβ UTA which theory does not include (Verma 2000). The value quoted in Perujo et al (1987) does not take into account the blend with the Kβ 5 satellite and has been corrected accordingly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 The K␤/K␣ ratio was found to be typical for the element in accordance with relativistic theoretical calculations by Scofield. 23 Hansen et al obtained a better agreement with theory in KC experiments than earlier highresolution PI experiments and explained the deviations in the PI studies with experimental difficulties.…”
Section: B Earlier K Capture Studiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…0,650-The counting efficiency ~:x in the formula of Chapter2 is composed of the single efficiencies of K~-radiation (98 % in the K-series of chlorine and 86 % 0,6 0 0 -in the K-series of bromine [9]) and of Ktj.~,...-radiation [8]. These single efficiencies are functions of the mass absorption coefficients, which were interpolated according to Veigele's table [,10]; the K-X-ray detection probabilities were calculated numerically o,55o- [,11].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%