1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01134864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic all-electron molecular Hartree-Fock-Dirac-(Breit) calculations on CH4, SiH4, GeH4, SnH4, PbH4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to the zerothorder term of an expansion of the full relativistic two-electron interaction in orders of c −2 , which is sufficient for most chemical purposes. 33 Although the two-electron operator in the Dirac-Coulomb…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corresponds to the zerothorder term of an expansion of the full relativistic two-electron interaction in orders of c −2 , which is sufficient for most chemical purposes. 33 Although the two-electron operator in the Dirac-Coulomb…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the persistent discrepancies over the ⌬H f value of silicon gas, 34,[78][79][80][81][82] seven molecules from the G2-1 test set containing silicon atoms have been removed from our initial test set. Work is currently being carried out upon small silicon-containing compounds in order to assess and improve the errors of the ccCA-CBS methods, and more quantitatively address controversy in the gas phase enthalpy of formation of silicon.…”
Section: A Performance Of Cccamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,[7][8][9][10] But a naive calculation of molecular properties within the DKH framework using the nonrelativistic expression for the property operator is plagued by an artifact called picture-change effect. [11][12][13][14][15][16] Recent second-order picture-change-affected DKH studies on tin compounds, for instance, revealed that following the estimates of Kellö and Sadlej 12 for the iodine nucleus in HI, one has to expect an overshoot of about 9% when calculating the electric field gradient from nonrelativistic property integrals. 17 Pioneering attempts to cope with that problem gave birth to the development of numerical finite difference schemes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%