2008
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.77.042507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic calculation of the two-photon decay rate of highly excited ionic states

Abstract: Based on quantum electrodynamics, we reexamine the two-photon decay of one-electron atoms.Special attention is paid to the calculation of the (two-photon) total decay rates which can be viewed as the imaginary part of the two-loop self-energy. We argue that our approach can easily be applied to the cases with a virtual state having an intermediate energy between the initial and the final state of the decay process leading, thus, to the resonance peaks in the two-photon energy distribution. In order to illustra… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
47
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
47
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, accurate treatment of the recombination process from the particular excited level, as presented in this paper, also may be of interest. In particular, we demonstrate that the consequent QED treatment of the 3p level decay should include the two-photon contribution comparable with the widely discussed two-photon decay of the 3s level [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In this paper, we limit ourselves only to electric dipole transitions (in both one-and two-photon decays) and ignore n d → ns transitions, which are also important [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, accurate treatment of the recombination process from the particular excited level, as presented in this paper, also may be of interest. In particular, we demonstrate that the consequent QED treatment of the 3p level decay should include the two-photon contribution comparable with the widely discussed two-photon decay of the 3s level [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31]. In this paper, we limit ourselves only to electric dipole transitions (in both one-and two-photon decays) and ignore n d → ns transitions, which are also important [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This approach was criticized later [8]. Another ("alternative") method which formally allows for the separate determination of the pure two-photon contribution in the case of two-photon transitions with cascades was developed in a series of works by Jentschura [25][26][27][28][29]. This approach contradicts the LPA results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main problem with this regularization scheme is that the resulting scattering amplitude is not strictly gauge invariant, but the noninvariance induced by the small regularizing imaginary parts of the energies of the virtual states is moved to higher orders. We note that very similar questions concerning two-photon emission amplitudes for bound states have recently been discussed in [46,47,48,49,50]. As an alternative, we propose to multiply the rate with the regularizing…”
Section: E Via Gauge Invariance To the Differential Ratementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, this scheme is not fully adequate; the main difficulty consists in interference between resonant and nonresonant photons. Recently a series of papers [10][11][12][13][14] was published where the author suggested an ''alternative'' approach for cascade separation. However, the procedure given in these works is not unique, and contains serious conceptual problems connected with the cascade definition and interference contributions to the total transition rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%