1996
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(96)00176-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic calculations for photonuclear reactions (III): A consistent relativistic analysis of the (e, e′p) and (γ, p) reactions

Abstract: Single nucleon knockout reactions must be described in a consistent framework in order to extract information about nuclear structure and reaction mechanisms. Consistent relativistic models for the direct knockout contribution to the (e, e ′ p) and (γ, p) reactions have been developed and used previously to examine existing momentum distribution and cross section data for the two reactions 1 . We present results of calculations of spin observables obtained from these models of (e, e ′ p) and (γ, p) reactions. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They are certainly dominant in the (γ, n) reaction, where the DKO mechanism, even in its most sophisticated version [37], gives but a small fraction of the experimental cross sections, while for the (γ, p) reaction the contribution of DKO is much more relevant. Nonrelativistic DWIA calculations, based on the same approach presented in Section 2.1 for the (e, e ′ N ) reaction [38], and more recent relativistic calculations, also based on the DKO mechanism [39], are able to give a fair description of data. The results, however, are very sensitive to the theoretical ingredients adopted for bound and scattering states.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are certainly dominant in the (γ, n) reaction, where the DKO mechanism, even in its most sophisticated version [37], gives but a small fraction of the experimental cross sections, while for the (γ, p) reaction the contribution of DKO is much more relevant. Nonrelativistic DWIA calculations, based on the same approach presented in Section 2.1 for the (e, e ′ N ) reaction [38], and more recent relativistic calculations, also based on the DKO mechanism [39], are able to give a fair description of data. The results, however, are very sensitive to the theoretical ingredients adopted for bound and scattering states.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far no approximations have been made. Various groups [17][18][19] have solved the Dirac equation (28) for the final scattering state using Dirac optical potentials derived from global fits to elastic proton scattering data [20]. Not only are global parametrizations of Dirac optical potentials usually restricted to proton kinetic energies T p ≤ 1 GeV, calculations based on exact solutions of the Dirac equation frequently become impractical at higher energies.…”
Section: B Bound State Wave Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A concerted research effort which started back in the late eighties has resulted in the development of a number of relativistic DWIA (RDWIA) models for computing A(e, e p) observables [11][12][13][14][15]. These theoretical efforts very much followed the trend of developing relativistic models for p + A → p + A processes as a potential improvement to the traditional non-relativistic distorted-wave approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, we introduce the relativistic formulation of Glauber multiplescattering theory in Section 3. Section 4 is devoted to a presentation of results for the DiracGlauber phase for the nuclei 4 He, 12 C, 56 Fe and 208 Pb. Hereby, a relativistic independentparticle model will be adopted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation