2000
DOI: 10.1086/308190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Dynamos in Magnetospheres of Rotating Compact Objects

Abstract: The kinematic evolution of axisymmetric magnetic fields in rotating magnetospheres of relativistic compact objects is analytically studied, based on relativistic Ohm's law in stationary axisymmetric geometry. By neglecting the poloidal flows of plasma in simplified magnetospheric models, we discuss self-excited dynamos due to the frame-dragging effect (originally pointed out by Khanna & Camenzind), and we propose alternative processes to generate axisymmetric magnetic fields against ohmic dissipation. The firs… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction of gravitational waves, and other general relativistic gravity effects, with electromagnetic fields and plasmas has attracted broad interest over the past few years, because of its possible application to both astrophysics and cosmology (e.g. Blandford & Znajek 1977; Thorne & Macdonald 1982; Macdonald & Thorne 1982; Tsagas & Barrow 1997; Tomimatsu 2000; Marklund, Dunsby & Brodin 2000; Tsagas & Mbbrtens 2000; Tsagas 2001; Tsagas et al 2003; Clarkson et al 2004). Here, we will derive the general form of the dynamo equation, using the 1 + 3 covariant formalism (Ellis & van Elst 1998), and analyse its coupling to matter and space–time geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction of gravitational waves, and other general relativistic gravity effects, with electromagnetic fields and plasmas has attracted broad interest over the past few years, because of its possible application to both astrophysics and cosmology (e.g. Blandford & Znajek 1977; Thorne & Macdonald 1982; Macdonald & Thorne 1982; Tsagas & Barrow 1997; Tomimatsu 2000; Marklund, Dunsby & Brodin 2000; Tsagas & Mbbrtens 2000; Tsagas 2001; Tsagas et al 2003; Clarkson et al 2004). Here, we will derive the general form of the dynamo equation, using the 1 + 3 covariant formalism (Ellis & van Elst 1998), and analyse its coupling to matter and space–time geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-vacuum fields are more complicated and have been [24] notice that high conductivity of the medium changes the field expulsion properties of the horizon. On the other hand, only few aspects of the misaligned BH magnetic fields have been explored so far [37,42]. This is because of an extra complexity caused by the frame-dragging [1,18].…”
Section: Forming Magnetic Layers By Gravitational Frame-draggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, only few aspects of the misaligned BH magnetic fields have been explored so far [37,42]. This is because of an extra complexity caused by the frame-dragging [1,18].…”
Section: Forming Magnetic Layers By Gravitational Frame-draggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnetic field is directed in a general angle with respect to the BH rotation axis. Only a few aspects of these misaligned magnetic fields have been explored so far (see Tomimatsu (2000) and Neronov and Aharonian (2007)). The transversal component is wound up around the horizon, and it is not expelled out of the horizon (i.e., the transversal magnetic flux across the horizon does not vanish even in the extremely rotating case, Bičák et al 2007).…”
Section: Stretching the Magnetic Lines By Gravitational Frame-draggingmentioning
confidence: 99%