2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2012.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic electron fluxes and dose rate variations during April–May 2010 geomagnetic disturbances in the R3DR data on ISS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The wide maximum in L values between 3.5 and 6.2 has to do with the observations of sporadic relativistic electron (blue points) precipitations generated in the ORB (Dachev et al, , 2011c). Single 10 s ORB measurements can deliver a maximum of ISS dose rate values up to 20,000 lGy h -1 .…”
Section: Data Selection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The wide maximum in L values between 3.5 and 6.2 has to do with the observations of sporadic relativistic electron (blue points) precipitations generated in the ORB (Dachev et al, , 2011c). Single 10 s ORB measurements can deliver a maximum of ISS dose rate values up to 20,000 lGy h -1 .…”
Section: Data Selection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron flux may cause problems for components located outside a spacecraft (e.g., solar cell degradation). They do not have enough energy to penetrate a heavily shielded spacecraft such as the ISS wall but may deliver large additional doses to astronauts during extravehicular activity (Dachev et al, , 2011c. The main absorbed dose inside the ISS is contributed by the protons of the inner radiation belt.…”
Section: Near-earth Radiation Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GCR protons in equatorial and low latitude regions have very small fluxes of less than 1 particle cm À 2 s À 1 , which is why the dose rate to flux ratio (D/F) is not stable and varies in the range from 0.03 to 30 nGy cm 2 part À 1 (please refer to Fig. 5 of Dachev et al, 2012b). This variation makes the SD inapplicable for characterization of the GCR radiation source.…”
Section: All Data Presentationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We do not have a reasonable explanation of the increase of the specific doses seen between 2nd and 12th May 2013. During the analysis of the data from ISS a selection procedure was established to distinguish between the three expected radiation sources: (i) GCR particles, (ii) protons in the SAA region of the IRB and (iii) relativistic electrons in the ORB (Haffner, 1971;Dachev, 2009;Dachev et al, 2012b). It was shown that the dose to flux ratio or specific dose (SD) can characterize the type of the predominant radiation source in Liulin-type instruments in the near-Earth radiation field.…”
Section: All Data Presentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation