2015
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.5b02001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relativistic Force Field: Parametrization of 13C–1H Nuclear Spin–Spin Coupling Constants

Abstract: Previously, we reported a reliable DU8 method for natural bond orbital (NBO)-aided parametric scaling of Fermi contacts to achieve fast and accurate prediction of proton-proton spin-spin coupling constants (SSCC) in (1)H NMR. As sophisticated NMR experiments for precise measurements of carbon-proton SSCCs are becoming more user-friendly and broadly utilized by the organic chemistry community to guide and inform the process of structure determination of complex organic compounds, we have now developed a fast an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the main purpose of this Minireview is to promote and present all the quantum chemistry tools available to assist in the NMR elucidation process, there are other useful approaches that deserve to be mentioned. One of them is the calculation of coupling constants ( J ) using quantum chemistry methods,, which have proven to be extremely useful to explore the conformational and stereochemical space of organic molecules . Other important methods that must be highlighted are the non‐quantum tools for structural assignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the main purpose of this Minireview is to promote and present all the quantum chemistry tools available to assist in the NMR elucidation process, there are other useful approaches that deserve to be mentioned. One of them is the calculation of coupling constants ( J ) using quantum chemistry methods,, which have proven to be extremely useful to explore the conformational and stereochemical space of organic molecules . Other important methods that must be highlighted are the non‐quantum tools for structural assignment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, only by separate analysis of these two J CH subsets was it possible to observe a large differentiation of the results for molecules 1 – 6 , depending on the KS‐DFT method used. Such J CH data subsets were also considered separately in other papers cited above . Clearly, all J values within these J CH ranges should be correctly reproduced by the sought universally applicable DFT method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The analysis of such relatively large databases of J CH values collected exclusively in one NMR laboratory is noteworthy in itself. On the contrary, discrepancies in J CH values are observed frequently in measurements from different laboratories …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 In the case of [4+2] cycloadduct the spin-spin coupling constant (SSCC) of benzylic proton on the neighboring CH served to distinguish between syn - and anti- diastereomers. For the syn- cycloadduct this SSCC is calculated at 6.4 Hz, whereas for anti- product SSCC the value is 9.2 Hz – almost a 3 Hz difference.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%