2016
DOI: 10.1515/agms-2016-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxation and Integral Representation for Functionals of Linear Growth on Metric Measure spaces

Abstract: Abstract:This article studies an integral representation of functionals of linear growth on metric measure spaces with a doubling measure and a Poincaré inequality. Such a functional is de ned via relaxation, and it de nes a Radon measure on the space. For the singular part of the functional, we get the expected integral representation with respect to the variation measure. A new feature is that in the representation for the absolutely continuous part, a constant appears already in the weighted Euclidean case.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the next remark, instead, we compare with the relaxation point of view of [16]. If we denote by μ a weak limit of |∇f n |, we obviously have μ ≥ |Df | on open sets A, hence μ ≥ |∇f | * ,1 m. From Lemma 5.2 we obtain that μ m and that |∇f n | → |∇f | * ,1 in L 1 (X, m).…”
Section: Sets Of Finite Perimeter and The Area Formulamentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the next remark, instead, we compare with the relaxation point of view of [16]. If we denote by μ a weak limit of |∇f n |, we obviously have μ ≥ |Df | on open sets A, hence μ ≥ |∇f | * ,1 m. From Lemma 5.2 we obtain that μ m and that |∇f n | → |∇f | * ,1 in L 1 (X, m).…”
Section: Sets Of Finite Perimeter and The Area Formulamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the presence of doubling and (1, 1)-Poincaré inequality for locally Lipschitz functions, however, (ii) is sufficient, see the proof of the implication from (iii) to (i) in Theorem 4.3 which only uses |Df | m (see also [16,Theorem 4.6]). We use the notation |∇f | * ,1 because, at this level of generality, we expect that weak gradients depend on the integrability exponent, even for Lipschitz functions, see [11] for examples compatible even with the doubling assumption.…”
Section: The Sobolev Space H 11 (X D M)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such a relaxation problem in such a metric measure setting was studied for the first time in [10] (see also [14,39,2,27,3,40,43,35] and the references therein) when L has p-growth, i.e., there exist α, β > 0 such that for every x ∈ X and every ξ ∈ M, Our motivation for developing relaxation, and more generally calculus of variations, in the setting of metric measure spaces comes from applications to hyperelasticity. In fact, the interest of considering a general measure is that its support can be interpretated as a hyperelastic structure together with its singularities like for example thin dimensions, corners, junctions, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%