2010
DOI: 10.2174/1874769801003010057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxation in a Natural Soil: Comparison of Relaxometric Imaging, T1– T2 Correlation and Fast-Field Cycling NMR

Abstract: Longitudinal and transverse relaxation times are used to characterise the pore system of a natural Kaldenkirchen sandy loam. Here we present new results obtained by relaxometric imaging (MEMS) and two-dimensional T 1 -T 2 correlation relaxometry, and compare these with available T 1 -relaxation time distributions of water obtained by the analysis of fast field cycling relaxometry (FFC) data. The soil shows relatively broad bimodal distribution functions P(T 1 ) and P(T 2 ) with a T 1 /T 2 ratio of about 2:1. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although called the ratio . Such features have also been observed for fluids within soil [43,44], cement [16,45], ceramics [46], and porous catalysts [14,15].…”
Section: T 1 and T 2 Relaxation In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Although called the ratio . Such features have also been observed for fluids within soil [43,44], cement [16,45], ceramics [46], and porous catalysts [14,15].…”
Section: T 1 and T 2 Relaxation In Porous Mediamentioning
confidence: 59%
“…These methods are mostly inconvenient for investigating flow processes in soils, however, because the lower limit of these methods is on the order of some hundred micrometers per second, and flow velocities in soils are mostly slower. Second, the major obstacle for using MRI in soils is the inherent fast transverse relaxation, which is in the range between 0.1 and 10 ms (Hall et al, 1997; Votrubova et al, 2000; Haber‐Pohlmeier et al, 2010). The reasons for this are the presence of paramagnetic impurities and small pore sizes, because T 2 relaxation is caused by the dephasing of local magnetic moments in local magnetic field gradients, which are created at solid–liquid interfaces.…”
Section: Basics Of Magnetic Resonance Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several nondestructive techniques [Roels et al, 2004], including nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [Carpenter et al, 1993;Leech et al, 2003;Pohlmeier et al, 2008a] and γ ray attenuation [Ferguson and Gardner, 1963;Nielsen, 1972;Nizovtsev et al, 2008], have been applied to probe distributions of water saturation and to study the dynamics of liquid transport in porous materials. The quantitative study of water in porous media using NMR or MRI is limited by the range of pore sizes that can be imaged and the presence of paramagnetic elements in the samples [Chen et al, 2003;Haber-Pohlmeier et al, 2010;Jelinkova et al, 2011;Pohlmeier et al, 2008a]. As an alternative method to visualize fluid flow in porous materials, X-ray imaging can be applied to visualize porosity and equilibrium fluid distributions in porous materials [Bayer, 2005;Nabawy and David, 2016;Pease et al, 2012;Roels and Carmeliet, 2006;Schillaci et al, 2008;Tidwell et al, 2000].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%