2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00210-002-0581-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxation of the mouse isolated aorta and carotid artery in response to adenosine analogues in genetically-modified mice lacking the adenosine A 2A receptor

Abstract: The aim of this study was to characterise the receptor(s) mediating responses to adenosine and/or adenosine analogues in mouse isolated aorta and carotid artery. In addition, since mice lacking the A(2A) adenosine receptor are reported to be hypertensive, the possibility that this gene deletion or the altered phenotype results in alteration of responses mediated via adenosine analogues was investigated. This was achieved by comparing results obtained in parallel within single experiments using tissues from A(2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A); this was not surprising, as others and we have reported it (40, 42). Smooth muscle contractions elicited by A 1 receptors are similar to those found in a wide variety of systems like mouse afferent arterioles (14), human cultured prostatic stromal cells (31), cat esophageal smooth muscle cells (35), guinea pig aorta (12) and mouse coronary artery cells and carotid artery (5, 30, 39). Importantly, however, we observed some unexpected differences between WT and A 1 KO mice downstream of the A 1 receptor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…1A); this was not surprising, as others and we have reported it (40, 42). Smooth muscle contractions elicited by A 1 receptors are similar to those found in a wide variety of systems like mouse afferent arterioles (14), human cultured prostatic stromal cells (31), cat esophageal smooth muscle cells (35), guinea pig aorta (12) and mouse coronary artery cells and carotid artery (5, 30, 39). Importantly, however, we observed some unexpected differences between WT and A 1 KO mice downstream of the A 1 receptor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%