2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-41579-6_22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxed Parsing of Regular Approximations of String-Embedded Languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, many CFPQ algorithms with various properties were proposed recently. They employ the ideas of different parsing algorithms, such as CYK in works by Hellings (2014) and Bradford (2017), (G)LR and (G)LL in works by Grigorev and Ragozina (2017), Medeiros et al (2018), Santos et al (2018), Verbitskaia et al (2016). Unfortunately, none of them has better than cubic time complexity in terms of the input graph size.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, many CFPQ algorithms with various properties were proposed recently. They employ the ideas of different parsing algorithms, such as CYK in works by Hellings (2014) and Bradford (2017), (G)LR and (G)LL in works by Grigorev and Ragozina (2017), Medeiros et al (2018), Santos et al (2018), Verbitskaia et al (2016). Unfortunately, none of them has better than cubic time complexity in terms of the input graph size.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, to check a syntactic correctness of dynamically generated strings, one should check that all generated strings (all paths from start states to final states in the given automaton) are correct with respect to the given context-free grammar. There are solutions to this problem: GLR-based checker of stringembedded SQL queries [3,7], parser of string-embedded languages [21] based on RNGLR parsing algorithm. RNGLRbased algorithm allows to construct derivation forest (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%