2006
DOI: 10.1029/2005jd006670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relaxing the well‐mixed greenhouse gas approximation in climate simulations: Consequences for stratospheric climate

Abstract: [1] The climatic consequences of relaxing the uniform greenhouse gas (GHG) assumption in the Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis atmospheric general circulation model are examined. A simple chemical loss parameterization for nitrous oxide, methane, CFC-11, and CFC-12 is employed that includes stratospheric water vapor production from methane oxidation. Multidecadal mean distributions of these species are obtained that compare reasonably well with UARS satellite observations of the stratosphere. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for weather forecasting it is generally not necessary to represent changes to trace gases during the simulation, so one may combine all wellmixed gases with carbon dioxide into a ''composite'' gas (e.g., Ritter and Geleyn 1992). Curry et al (2006) showed that the global-mean temperature error resulting from assuming methane and nitrous oxide to be well mixed is less than 0.2 K below 30 km, rising to 1 K above 50 km, while the error due to treating CFC11 and CFC12 as well mixed is less than 0.1 K everywhere below 50 km. These small errors will have no detectable impact on the accuracy of weather forecasts.…”
Section: Results For a Single Absorbing Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that for weather forecasting it is generally not necessary to represent changes to trace gases during the simulation, so one may combine all wellmixed gases with carbon dioxide into a ''composite'' gas (e.g., Ritter and Geleyn 1992). Curry et al (2006) showed that the global-mean temperature error resulting from assuming methane and nitrous oxide to be well mixed is less than 0.2 K below 30 km, rising to 1 K above 50 km, while the error due to treating CFC11 and CFC12 as well mixed is less than 0.1 K everywhere below 50 km. These small errors will have no detectable impact on the accuracy of weather forecasts.…”
Section: Results For a Single Absorbing Gasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational time spent resolving the spectrum is also not matched by the time spent resolving the spatial structure of clouds within a grid box, leading to substantial radiative biases (Cahalan et al 1994;Shonk and Hogan 2008). Moreover, while it is necessary to represent trace gases individually for climate forecasts and reanalysis projects, the accuracy of day-to-day numerical weather forecasts is largely insensitive to errors in their representation; Curry et al (2006) showed that assuming trace gases to be vertically well mixed led to a temperature error of less than 0.2 K below 30 km, rising to 1 K above 50 km. It is therefore highly desirable to explore ways to treat gaseous absorption more efficiently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since both CH 4 concentrations and land area are largest in the NH, using a more realistic surface concentration distribution should lead to an even larger north/south imbalance in the methane sink than already seen (approximately 60/40, according to Paper I), and a slightly larger global uptake. Furthermore, the parameterization of methane consumption utilized in this paper can be combined with a simplified atmospheric CH 4 chemistry scheme, already tested in AGCM3 (Curry et al, 2006), to enable completely prognostic methane sinks in a coupled GCM. For a prescribed surface CH 4 concentration field, running the model to equilibrium would then determine the relative contributions of the atmosphere and soil to the total CH 4 sink.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Collins et al, 2006); that is, these models consider CH 4 as a well-mixed gas, which is unrealistic above the tropopause. Using a simpler parameterisation approach than CoMeCAT, Curry et al (2006) showed the impact that relaxing the wellmixed approximation for some greenhouse gases (GHGs) 9654 B. M. Monge-Sanz et al: Stratospheric methane and water in global models had in the stratosphere. They used the Canadian AGCM3 general circulation model (McFarlane et al, 1992) with a simplified treatment for the chemical loss of N 2 O, CH 4 , CFC-11 and CFC-12.…”
Section: Stratospheric Methane Radiation and Temperaturementioning
confidence: 99%