1989
DOI: 10.13182/nt89-a34305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Release of Radioactive Materials in Simulation Tests of a Postulated Solvent Fire in a Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify the risk of radioactive material resuspension from a TBP solvent set on fire, some experiments have been carried out but, with the exception of Mishima et al who studied fractional release from heating plutonium nitrate solution without TBP, no other experiment with plutonium was conducted due to the critical safety constraints. The main experimental results are gathered in Table , leaving out the tests involving ruthenium, because the possible formation of RuO 4(g) may significantly alter the measured fractional release with respect to other radioactive materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To quantify the risk of radioactive material resuspension from a TBP solvent set on fire, some experiments have been carried out but, with the exception of Mishima et al who studied fractional release from heating plutonium nitrate solution without TBP, no other experiment with plutonium was conducted due to the critical safety constraints. The main experimental results are gathered in Table , leaving out the tests involving ruthenium, because the possible formation of RuO 4(g) may significantly alter the measured fractional release with respect to other radioactive materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some other tests were performed in the presence of some FPs (Ru, Cs, and Sr) in the acid phase with quite low concentrations (total smaller than 2.5 g/L) and suggest a release of uranium but without any convincing supporting arguments. Nishio and Hashimoto conducted some tests with uranium and some FPs and measured a low fractional release, smaller than 0.1% for U. In addition, they have analyzed their experimental data on the basis of a physical modeling of the phenomena involved but it appears that the phenomenology is complex and many model parameters are either fitted to experiments or calculated from empirical relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously mentioned, cerium­(IV) has been largely considered in previous studies for investigating airborne release of plutonium during accidental fires. From an experimental point of view, among six studies summarized by Quintiere for fires involving liquid fuels, three have been carried out by considering cerium­(IV) as a surrogate. However, cerium­(IV) is known for its high oxidizing power and could potentially be reduced to cerium­(III) during or after extraction and fire, which would not be truly representative of plutonium­(IV) behavior. Then, the question of its relevance as a plutonium­(IV) surrogate, in terms of airborne release in the event of a fire, representative of the PUREX process, is still under consideration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%