2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0771-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Release of ultrafine particles from three simulated building processes

Abstract: 10Building activities are recognised to produce coarse particulate matter but less is 11 known about the release of airborne ultrafine particles (UFPs; those below 100 nm 12 in diameter). For the first time, this study has investigated the release of particles 13 in the 5-560 nm range from three simulated building activities: the crushing of 14 concrete cubes, the demolition of old concrete slabs, and the recycling of concrete 15 debris. A fast response differential mobility spectrometer (Cambustion DMS50) 16 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
2
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
28
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…, resulting in a rise of over 17-times the background values. The concentrations measured in this study were found to be in agreement with our previous findings (Kumar et al, 2012c) where the total PNCs during the dry recycling process were found to be ~2.51 10 5 cm -3…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, resulting in a rise of over 17-times the background values. The concentrations measured in this study were found to be in agreement with our previous findings (Kumar et al, 2012c) where the total PNCs during the dry recycling process were found to be ~2.51 10 5 cm -3…”
Section: 2supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Knowledge of size-resolved PNDs is essential for accurately estimating the deposition doses in the respiratory region (i.e. sum of alveolar, tracheobronchial and extrathoracis regions), which can occur as a result of exposure to airborne particles during recycling events (Kumar et al, 2012c). Average size-resolved PNDs measured at each sampling location were used, together with size-resolved deposited efficiency, as proposed by the ICRP model (ICRP, 1994).…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be the case that the attrition between the surfaces of equipment and building materials during high rotational frequency have produced precursor gases, however, further investigations are clearly needed to reach to a clear consensus. The average values of PNCs during our general demolition activity at refurbishment site were ~2-times lower than those reported by Kumar et al (2012c) during simulation of slab demolition in the laboratory. Furthermore, our results of average PNCs during the drilling activity (5.22 ± 4.44 ×10 4 cm -3 ) was ~5-times lower compared with laboratory studies of Azarmi et al (2014).…”
Section: Particle Number Concentrationscontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…The PNCs below 100 nm size were found to be increased to about 1.6 times during demolition compared with the background PNCs. A recent study by Kumar et al (2012c) investigated the release of particle number and size distributions in the 5-560 nm range from the three simulated building activities: the crushing of concrete cubes, the demolition of old concrete slabs, and the recycling of concrete debris. The measurements were taken in a controlled laboratory environment, at about 0.15 m away from the samples since the aim was to investigate the emission rates of nanoparticles.…”
Section: Nanoparticle Emissions and Their Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are referring here the NES to the sources other than the tailpipe exhausts of ground vehicles. A number of NES are the focus of this article (see justification in Section 2), including particles arising from road-tyre interaction, brake wear and resuspension (Dahl et al, 2006;Mathissen et al, 2011), industrial emissions such as from power plants (Li et al, 2009), idling, taxiing and take-off from aircraft at airports (Hu et al, 2009;Mazaheri et al, 2009), ship emissions from ports or harbours (Saxe and Larsen, 2004), construction, demolition and processing of concrete (Hansen et al, 2008;Kumar et al, 2012c), residential and commercial cooking (Buonanno et al, 2009b;Buonanno et al, 2010), domestic biomass burning (Hosseini et al, 2010), forest fires and burning of agriculture residue (Reid et al, 2005), municipal waste incineration (Buonanno et al, 2009a), cigarette smoking , and secondary formation .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%