2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2010.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of airborne lidar and multispectral image data for urban scene classification using Random Forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
226
0
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 421 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
3
226
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The next step in the process was to choose a suitable image classification method. We used the Random Forests (RF) classification in this study, which has demonstrated excellent performance for the analysis of different remote sensing datasets [68][69][70]. Random Forest, first developed by Breiman (2001) [71], is an ensemble method for supervised classification and regression based on classification and regression trees (CART).…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The next step in the process was to choose a suitable image classification method. We used the Random Forests (RF) classification in this study, which has demonstrated excellent performance for the analysis of different remote sensing datasets [68][69][70]. Random Forest, first developed by Breiman (2001) [71], is an ensemble method for supervised classification and regression based on classification and regression trees (CART).…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two methods are used to calculate M in Random Forest, one-third or square root of the number of input variables [70]. Only two-third of random samples were chosen as training set and remaining one-third samples, called Out-of-Bag (OOB) samples, are used as test samples to compute classification accuracy [69]. This OOB accuracy is generally plotted against the increment of number of trees to determine appropriate number of trees.…”
Section: Image Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this regard, the straightforward solution consists in selecting a standard approach for supervised classification, e.g. a Support Vector Machine classifier Lodha et al, 2006), a Random Forest classifier (Chehata et al, 2009;Guo et al, 2011;Steinsiek et al, 2017), an AdaBoost(-like) classifier (Lodha et al, 2007;Guo et al, 2015) or a Bayesian Discriminant Analysis classifier (Khoshelham and Oude Elberink, 2012). However, as these classifiers treat each point of the point cloud individually, they do not take into account a spatial regularity of the derived labeling, i.e.…”
Section: Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With aerial data acquisition, urban classification typically further diversifies -not only building outlines are extracted (Ortner et al, 2007), but typically the scenery is divided into vegetation, ground and buildings. Besides pure 2D image segmentation, state-of-the-art is to use 3D point cloud information obtained from dense image matching (Haala and Rothermel, 2015) or LiDAR (Guo et al, 2011). Data obtained by LiDAR systems can either stem from airborne laser scanning (ALS) or terrestrial -either static (TLS) or mobile (MLS).…”
Section: Urban Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%