2016
DOI: 10.1002/jso.24536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of CEA and LDH in relation to KRAS status in patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases

Abstract: Background While the significance of CEA, LDH and KRAS status as individual prognostic factors for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer has been addressed, the relationship and interdependence between these prognostic factors on survival is limited. Methods Patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases with known KRAS status, and with baseline CEA and LDH levels who were treated with hepatic arterial infusion and systemic chemotherapy were identified. Patients were divided into two groups: hep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, right colon (OR, 1.550; P = 0.012) and well and moderately differentiated tumours (OR, 2.203; P = 0.001) were independent predictive factors of KRAS mutations. STMs were reported to not be associated with KRAS mutations in several studies [21,27,28]. However, negative CA199 was found to be signi cantly correlated with KRAS mutations in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In our study, right colon (OR, 1.550; P = 0.012) and well and moderately differentiated tumours (OR, 2.203; P = 0.001) were independent predictive factors of KRAS mutations. STMs were reported to not be associated with KRAS mutations in several studies [21,27,28]. However, negative CA199 was found to be signi cantly correlated with KRAS mutations in our study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In the mutated KRAS group, CEA levels above 5 ng/ml were identified more frequently when compared to the wild-type KRAS group (p=0.048). A recent study does not show a correlation between CEA levels (cut-off point 200) and KRAS status among 193 patients with metastatic CRC 8 . Therefore, it is difficult to sustain the correlation between CEA levels and KRAS status due to the heterogeneity of the cutoff points, the diversified laboratory methodology employed, the number and ethnicity of patients between studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The prognostic value of LDH in CRC patients has remained inconsistent between non-metastatic and metastatic settings, especially between resectable and unresectable CRLM [21][22][23]. Elevated circulating LDH level was reported to be an adverse prognostic factor in unresectable CRLM patients receiving systemic therapy or hepatic arterial infusion [24][25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%