2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2020.09.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of Population-Based Cutoffs to Define Sarcopenia in Clinical Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is understood, and the authors themselves acknowledge, that nutritional parameters which are used to derive LFI are dependent on the ethnicity of the population studied. [ 2,3 ] Further, the LFI cutoffs used in the study were not gender‐specific, again underestimating the prevalence of frailty among female subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is understood, and the authors themselves acknowledge, that nutritional parameters which are used to derive LFI are dependent on the ethnicity of the population studied. [ 2,3 ] Further, the LFI cutoffs used in the study were not gender‐specific, again underestimating the prevalence of frailty among female subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%