Precipitation Partitioning by Vegetation 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29702-2_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of Precipitation Partitioning to the Tree Water and Nutrient Balance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this way, a spiderwort's (and other shallow‐rooted, short plants') capability to take up water into their vascular transport networks (through roots) may be tied, in part, to the stemflow mechanism transporting water to the roots. Competition among plants' roots for water below ground has been studied for decades (Aubrey, 2020), but our stemflow redirection results (Figure 4) suggest that competition for water may also (passively) occur above ground among plants' extravascular networks. Because stemflow is generally enriched in nutrients (Ponette‐González et al, 2020), the redirection of stemflow from neighbouring plants may, hypothetically, also redirect nutrients that were washed or leached from neighbouring canopies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In this way, a spiderwort's (and other shallow‐rooted, short plants') capability to take up water into their vascular transport networks (through roots) may be tied, in part, to the stemflow mechanism transporting water to the roots. Competition among plants' roots for water below ground has been studied for decades (Aubrey, 2020), but our stemflow redirection results (Figure 4) suggest that competition for water may also (passively) occur above ground among plants' extravascular networks. Because stemflow is generally enriched in nutrients (Ponette‐González et al, 2020), the redirection of stemflow from neighbouring plants may, hypothetically, also redirect nutrients that were washed or leached from neighbouring canopies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…and sugarcane plantations, with the latter being regularly burned (Tonello et al, 2021a). Comparing leaching of nutrients from deciduous tree species to those from coniferous tree species provides an inconsistent picture (Aubrey, 2020). Canopy leaching found to be higher for deciduous trees than for coniferous (Adriaenssens et al, 2012), whereas others found the opposite result (Berger et al, 2008).…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other parts of precipitation with contact to the canopy may be intercepted, building a short-term water storage pool, from which the three main water fluxescanopy interception, TF, and SFarise. Under certain conditions, water can also be absorbed by leaves and bark (Aubrey, 2020;Berry et al, 2019;Van Stan et al, 2021). Both meteorological factors and the canopy structure of forests affect rainfall partitioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, forest canopies change precipitation partitioning that affects the nutrient cycling in the forest ecosystem: interception, throughfall, and stemflow [ 21 ]. Canopy partitioning can impact the dynamics of tree water and nutrient balances [ 22 ]. The minerals dissolved in interception can directly enter the plant through foliar and bark uptake, and also can reach forest soil via throughfall or stemflow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minerals dissolved in interception can directly enter the plant through foliar and bark uptake, and also can reach forest soil via throughfall or stemflow. Nutrients can also be leached from throughfall and stemflow and input into soils [ 22 ]. Interception as well as throughfall and stemflow are influenced by many features of the forest type, such as density, branch angle, the uniformity, bark characteristics, leaf shape and leaf area index [ 23 ], which are very complicated in forest ecosystems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%