2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Relevance of the OCT1 transporter to the antineoplastic effect of biguanides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
70
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
70
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…An important point to bear in mind is that effects of metformin are unlikely to be homogeneous across tissues, not only due to higher concentration in the portal circulation than the systemic circulation following oral dosing, but also due to the fact that tissues vary in their expression of the transport molecules required for metformin uptake. Although these transporters play a key role for metformin uptake at drug concentrations achievable in vivo , cellular accumulation of other more lipophilic biguanides, such as phenformin, are less dependent on active transport, and therefore may differ greatly from metformin in terms of tissue distribution and have greater antineoplastic activity, as suggested by laboratory studies (75)(76)(77).…”
Section: Effects At the Whole-organism Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important point to bear in mind is that effects of metformin are unlikely to be homogeneous across tissues, not only due to higher concentration in the portal circulation than the systemic circulation following oral dosing, but also due to the fact that tissues vary in their expression of the transport molecules required for metformin uptake. Although these transporters play a key role for metformin uptake at drug concentrations achievable in vivo , cellular accumulation of other more lipophilic biguanides, such as phenformin, are less dependent on active transport, and therefore may differ greatly from metformin in terms of tissue distribution and have greater antineoplastic activity, as suggested by laboratory studies (75)(76)(77).…”
Section: Effects At the Whole-organism Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenformin is associated with higher risk of lactic acidosis than metformin, but nevertheless has a better safety profi le than most antineoplastic agents in current use, and is more effective than metformin in preclinical models, probably because of its pharmacokinetic characteristics (75)(76)(77). There are libraries of many biguanides that could be screened for antineoplastic activity and/or used as lead compounds for optimization of pharmacokinetics.…”
Section: Identifying the Key Mechanisms Of Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phenformin is 50-fold more potent than metformin as an inhibitor of mitochondrial complex 1 and being lipophilic (21) is less dependent on OCT (27), retaining the dose-dependent antiproliferative effect in ovarian cancer cell lines even in the presence of OCT1 siRNA (28). Given that oxidative phosphorylation-dependent production of ATP seems to be secondary to mitochondrial synthesis of anabolic precursors in proliferating cells (29), it has been suggested that metformin exerts the chemopreventive effects by functioning as a weak mitochondrial poison inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation (30).…”
Section: Mitochondrial Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarker studies built in to all these trials will be essential to identify the breast cancers with characteristics (such as the LKB1-AMPK or p53-defective pathways) most likely to be susceptible to the effects of metformin. Cancer heterogeneity of OCT1, and hence for cancer cell uptake of metformin, as observed in ovarian cancer (28), may merit measurement before considering metformin therapy in the clinical setting given, for example, the low expression of OCT1 in normal breast tissues. The potential effects of polymorphisms of LKB1, OCT 1,2,3, and ATM on resistance to metformin (70) and interactions between proton pump inhibitors and metformin via OCT 1,2,3 (70) will clearly need to be considered when metformin translates into routine clinical practice.…”
Section: Metformin and Breast Cancer Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that these inconsistencies may result from unrecognized genetic and/or metabolic characteristics of the tumor or the host that determine metformin sensitivity. Prior work has identified host insulin levels (10), LKB1 status (10), and expression of transport molecules for metformin uptake (33) as candidate predictors of metformin sensitivity. Here, we examined carbon source and myc expression as candidate predictive markers for antineoplastic activity of metformin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%